On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 12:38, Michael Gratton wrote:
> They have also been successful in getting other projects to use more
> inclusive language. For example, MongoDB initially refused to stop
> using the term "master", but then relented after Python did so.
That's misrepresenting it *AGAIN*. Both
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 06:23, Tristan Van Berkom via desktop-devel-list
wrote:
> Proposing that we replace references to master/slave relationships with
> other terminology and proposing that we eliminate the usage of both
> words entirely are two entirely different proposals, this is a proposal
>
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 06:21, wrote:
> This should go without saying, but master branches are not a reference
> to slavery, rather to canonicity. The master branch is the canonical
> branch, the primary copy.
This is very much my thinking too. I'd agree with this proposal if
every branch forked f
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 17:09, Allan Day wrote:
> gnome-multi-writer
Removed in master.
Richard.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hi all,
Now that Google+ is declared officially dead, I wondered if GNOME
would consider hosting a Mastodon instance. There's a bug already
open, https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/issues/23
-- but I guess this needs someone to drive this and actually do the
work. I know I woul
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 at 17:32, wrote:
> From the lack of objections to Allan's original proposal, it's clear
> that we have consensus on removing the app menus, so I suggest we
> should feel free to delete our app menus in master after branching for
> 3.30.
I'm currently on PTO for another week (
