git commit messages

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Hey, The GTK+ team documented how they'd like to see the git commit messages in http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+/tree/README.commits = copy paste = The expected format for git commit messages is as follows: === begin example commit === Short explanation

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : Hey, I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from git on demand. Those macros have been modified and gathered in http://live.gnome.org/Git/ChangeLog to only generate ChangeLog for make dist. I

Re: On autogenerated ChangeLog

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 15:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 16:47 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : Hey, I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pango to generate ChangeLog from git on demand

Re: Generating .gitignore files

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 21:51 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : Hi, Based on an idea from halfline, I hacked a few lines to automatically generate .gitignore from Makefile.am. It grew to a couple hundred lines, and is available from pango/git.mk. [...] Bug reports, enhancements, etc

Re: git commit messages

2009-04-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009, à 16:46 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Hey, The GTK+ team documented how they'd like to see the git commit messages in http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+/tree/README.commits = copy paste = The expected format for git commit

Re: Bumping required version of DeviceKit-power to 007

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 10:03 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit : Can I bump the external dependencies version of DeviceKit-power from 006 to 007 for 2.27.x please? 007 was released a few weeks ago, and fixes many bugs I don't want to work around in gnome-power-manager anymore. Sounds good.

Re: How to remove remote branch with git?

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 18 avril 2009, à 22:28 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: I just did my first commit with git (Yay!!). However I first made a mistake and made a new remote branch called jaap in the cheese project. I now want to remove that branch because it was a mistake.

Re: Adding module descriptions

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 11:46 -0400, Owen Taylor a écrit : B) Drop MAINTAINERS and move the information to the DOAP file. (There would be some sort of transition period where we would support both.) I like B) better; I'd rather one file than a collection of little files.

Re: Adding module descriptions

2009-04-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009, à 20:55 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : The point is deps are not changed at random, the person merging code changes is the best person to update build deps. This is unfortunately not something you can always find in ChangeLog/NEWS. What about reminding maintainers

Re: dconf

2009-04-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 02 avril 2009, à 11:37 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : Ideally, I'd like to see GNOME using GSettings for 3.0. Rob Taylor (my boss) has indicated that I will definitely be able to spend time addressing issues that may arise with dconf and GSettings in the lead-up to 3.0. Just a

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-09 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le mercredi 08 avril 2009, à 23:27 -0700, Dave Neary a écrit : I'm not sure what can be done about it now, but at least, it might be useful if release team discussions on this subject were published for review, I think. I can think of only one private mail discussion about this (although

Re: dconf

2009-04-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 02 avril 2009, à 12:31 -0400, Ryan Lortie a écrit : One thing that dconf is missing that GConf gives you, however, is schemas. You could get this by using dconf as a backend from the gconf daemon. It seems like this is sort of missing the point, though. [...] This is honestly

Re: Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le jeudi 02 avril 2009, à 11:44 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit : For developers local to the Boston area, I'm happy to take a visit to your sight to go over accessibility considerations and to discuss your new UI's with you from an accessibility standpoint. I promise to focus solely

Re: GNOME 3.0 Schedule draft; Streamlining of the Platform.

2009-04-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 02 avril 2009, à 11:26 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit : 2) We are working with another organization right now to investigate magnification solutions. This may involve picking up on http://projects.gnome.org/outreach/a11y/tasks/magnification/, and I suspect the ultimate solution

Planning for GNOME 3.0

2009-04-02 Thread Vincent Untz
During the first few months of 2008, a few Release Team members discussed here and there about the state of GNOME. This was nothing official, and it could actually have been considered as some friends talking together about things they deeply care about. There were thoughts that GNOME could stay

Re: bug-buddy integration

2009-03-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 20 mars 2009, à 16:15 +, Matt Keenan a écrit : Slight side topic question here... for gnome 2.24, GTK_MODULES was set to include gnomebreakpad on session login depending on whether /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modeules/libgnomebreakpad.so existed or now. Removing gnomebreakpad from

Re: TARBALLS DUE (before Monday 23:59 UTC!, don't forget translators!): GNOME 2.26.0 Final Release

2009-03-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 14 mars 2009, à 10:39 -0400, Robert Macewan a écrit : Vincent, You're 404'ing with linkage to http://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/2.26.0/ The mail said We will publish jhbuild modulesets on Tuesday. We're not Tuesday yet :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

Yes, you can help with session saving!

2009-03-14 Thread Vincent Untz
Dear friends, We have a nearly-working implemention of session saving in trunk at the moment (thanks to efforts from Lucas!). However, a bunch of small bugs makes it not good enough for real use. I put a patch in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552387 that should make things work

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GPointingDeviceSettings-1.0.0

2009-03-08 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le dimanche 08 mars 2009, à 20:08 +0900, Hiroyuki Ikezoe a écrit : Hello everyone, GPointingDeviceSettings-1.0.0 has been released. GPointingDeviceSettings is a new GUI tool for setting various pointing devices. Each UI can be written as dynamic loadable module, so a third party can

Modules needing a release for 2.26.0

2009-03-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, Here's a list of modules that didn't see a release since quite some time. It'd be nice to be sure that they either had no change at all, or that someone rolls a tarball for 2.26.0 in 10 days. Note that if there's no news for a module before March 16th, the release team will roll tarballs

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 14:35 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a écrit : Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform? We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now. Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I believe.

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 20:31 +0100, Gian Mario Tagliaretti a écrit : On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now. Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I believe.

Re: quo vadis, docs

2009-02-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 17 février 2009, à 07:46 +, Phil Bull a écrit : Hi Vincent, On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 00:45 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: This could be possible if we have enough mentors. And from what I understood from Shaun, this is part of the issue. Note that I don't think I'd be a good mentor

Re: gnome-doc-utils, automake 1.9, and -Wno-portability

2009-02-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 15 février 2009, à 16:21 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit : It seems to me that, if we just require GNU make, we ought to just pass -Wno-portability to automake. Makes sense to me. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___

Re: quo vadis, docs

2009-02-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 16 février 2009, à 23:41 +0100, Christian Kirbach a écrit : On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:52:55 +0100, Diego Escalante Urrelo die...@gnome.org wrote: On 2/10/09, Gil Forcada gforc...@gnome.org wrote: Stormy is asking for ideas and topics for spend the advisory fundings, so why not

Re: gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs moved to git

2009-02-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 12 février 2009, à 09:54 +1300, John Stowers a écrit : On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:25 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote: gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs were today moved over to git. The old svn repositories will still work, but only in read-only mode. Does this mean the GNOME

Re: New Desktop Testing team

2009-02-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 10 février 2009, à 15:13 +0100, Ara Pulido a écrit : It was announced in the gnome-announce-list. For future reference: announcements like this are 100% appropriate for devel-announce-list too ;-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

Re: python-gmenu and multiple languages

2009-02-09 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le samedi 07 février 2009, à 15:20 -0600, miket a écrit : Hello, Hoping this is the right place for python-gmenu questions... it seemed to be the only associated mailing list I could find. I've figured out how to use the python bindings to navigate the menu system, but when I get to

Re: Nautilus drop-down menu with view type

2009-02-09 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 08 février 2009, à 07:26 -0800, Sandy Armstrong a écrit : (You forgot to CC the list, so I'm CCing my response) On 02/08/2009 02:41 AM, Matteo Settenvini wrote: On sab, 2009-02-07 at 15:25 -0800, Sandy Armstrong wrote: Also, where is this drop-down menu with the view type? Do you

pessulus branched for GNOME 2.24

2009-01-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, I've branched pessulus for GNOME 2.24 so I can add a small error dialog with new strings in trunk. Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 19 janvier 2009, à 11:30 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : Wouldn't it be easier to convert the old applet to also use a tray icon? This way no useless applet needs to stay in the memory (due to the fact applets have no programmatical way to add or remove themselves at run time). Or

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 15 janvier 2009, à 10:59 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 19:18 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit : - Split Brasero into a library (available on trunk) named libbrasero-media that is being documented (devhelp) and re-arranged so we can deliver a stable

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009, à 12:25 +, Luis Medinas a écrit : Right now Brasero is currently re-licensing the library again, we already contacted the people involved asking about the change. There were some bits in the library that Philippe re-wrote (that used NCB code) to be compatible

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009, à 10:54 +0100, Frederic Crozat a écrit : Le dimanche 11 janvier 2009 à 04:39 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit : On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 00:10 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: Ahoj, a reminder that module inclusion discussion must heat up now. At January 19th,

Re: GNOME 2.25.4 released!

2009-01-08 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 08 janvier 2009, à 12:48 +0100, Johannes Schmid a écrit : Hi! Once again: the NEWS script only looks for diffs from the previous release of *the same MAJOR.MINOR line*. As there was no previous 2.25.* anjuta release, there is nothing to diff against. But that would mean that

Re: ekiga 3.1.0

2009-01-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 06 janvier 2009, à 14:43 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : Damien Sandras released : Module: ekiga Version: 3.1.0 It requires newer versions of ptlib (2.5.2) and opal (3.5.2); no objection bumping those external dependencies ? I vote for automatically bumping

Re: Cleaning libegg

2008-12-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 11 décembre 2008, à 23:39 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit : Hi, Every now and then, there's someone sending a patch for something in libegg that shouldn't be used anymore. I think it makes sense to remove the code from libegg that has been integrated in other libraries so that people

Re: Eel merged into Nautilus 2.25.3

2008-12-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008, à 13:30 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : The one thing I found in Fedora that really uses eel in a substantial way is a program called gnome-translate. I guess they're in for a bunch of porting work. Nod. But we don't have to ship eel anymore in the desktop suite --

Re: Hosting app binaries at download.gnome.org?

2008-12-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 19 décembre 2008, à 07:46 -0800, Sandy Armstrong a écrit : Hi, I'm wondering where I should be putting my Tomboy binaries for Windows/Mac. I'd like to have them in the same place where source tarballs are downloaded [1], but I don't know how to do that or even if it is

Re: Move intltool to External Deps from Dev Platform

2008-12-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 15 décembre 2008, à 09:48 -0500, Rodney Dawes a écrit : Hi, I would like to propose that we remove intltool from the Developer Platform module set, and place it in External Dependencies. As intltool is a build tool, rather than a library, and is meant to be useful outside the scope

Re: Bump gtk-vnc dependency

2008-12-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 16 décembre 2008, à 10:53 -0300, Jonh Wendell a écrit : Hello, folks. I want to update vinagre dependency on gtk-vnc to 0.3.8, which was released last week. This is important because, besides the usual fixes, it allows scaling based on cairo, and not gtkGlExt anymore. In order

Re: Eel merged into Nautilus 2.25.3

2008-12-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 15 décembre 2008, à 21:05 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : Alexander Larsson wrote: I just released Nautilus 2.25.3 which contains an internalized copy of eel, and I don't plan to do any more eel releases. This lets the compiler do better optimizations and means one less library

Re: [Libgnome-menu2] Any quick way to check which part of the tree is updated?

2008-12-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 13 novembre 2008, à 10:23 +0800, Liu, Raymond a écrit : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452375 Vincent I noticed that this bug is opened 15 months ago, is there any progress or plan on this by now :) Also I don't know is there anyone else doing this work now? I am

Re: Proposal for GNOME Goal: msgctxt migration

2008-12-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 18 novembre 2008, à 17:27 +0100, Christian Rose a écrit : Hi, Quite some people already are implementing this goal. http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/MsgctxtMigration FWIW, I updated the instructions a bit to mention the case of NC_() which needs a call to g_dpgettext2() at

Cleaning libegg

2008-12-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Every now and then, there's someone sending a patch for something in libegg that shouldn't be used anymore. I think it makes sense to remove the code from libegg that has been integrated in other libraries so that people don't lose time doing this, and also to avoid people using this old

Re: Cleaning libegg

2008-12-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 11 décembre 2008, à 18:05 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : Vincent Untz wrote: Keeping: + md5 GChecksum? Ah, I was sure it was integrated in glib but I couldn't find the API. Thanks :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés

Re: Reduced Bugzilla functionality for 6+ months -- acceptable?

2008-12-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 04 décembre 2008, à 17:00 +0100, Olav Vitters a écrit : Is above acceptable? The current situation is a dead-end, so I'm all for moving, even if we lose some stuff. We'll eventually reimplement stuff that is important to us, and hopefully, we'll be able to do it in a more

Re: Reduced Bugzilla functionality for 6+ months -- acceptable?

2008-12-04 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 04 décembre 2008, à 12:56 -0500, Colin Walters a écrit : On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Cosimo Cecchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - simple-dup-finder Suggest we move crashes out of Bugzilla and into a separate database (like Socorro). Bugzilla should only be for hand-written input

Re: Bump telepathy-glib version to 0.7.15

2008-11-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 30 novembre 2008, à 22:05 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : I wrote: Just like libxklavier, I will update jhbuild modulesets on second approval notice, so we get correct external dependencies for 2.25.2. Actually jhbuild moduleset does have 0.7.17 already, I should have

Re: libxklavier: request for the minimum version change

2008-11-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 30 novembre 2008, à 22:00 +0100, Frederic Peters a écrit : Sergey Udaltsov wrote: Does anybody mind changing the minimum version of libxklavier (in deps) - to 3.8? Only g-s-d is affected, new signal is introduced (for the keyboard hotplugging). It's okay for me; I will

gnome-session branched for GNOME 2.24, from an old revision

2008-11-25 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, I've branched gnome-session for GNOME 2.24. The branch name is the usual gnome-2-24. Note that there was some changes that were not for 2.24 in trunk, so I had to branch from revision 5150. This means that one translation (sv) has been updated in trunk but not in gnome-2-24. Daniel, I

Re: Is this a UI freeze break?

2008-11-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 17 novembre 2008, à 15:01 -0500, Matthew Barnes a écrit : I fixed a bug in Evolution's infamous ETable widget that makes header labels left-aligned instead of center-aligned for better consistency with GtkTreeView. It was well received and I was told to ask whether this kind of

Re: DVCS

2008-11-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 17 novembre 2008, à 17:56 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : Owen Taylor wrote: Question for gnome-infrastructure: How do we move forward on it? Do we have an easier alternative at hand then just writing low-tech one off application? I was thinking that we can either use the

Re: [Libgnome-menu2] Any quick way to check which part of the tree is updated?

2008-11-12 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 12 novembre 2008, à 14:30 +0800, Liu, Raymond a écrit : Hi I quickly browse through the source code of libgnome-menu2, and I read some of the app code who using this library. I can see that when tree is changed, With the data we got from the call back function we

Re: Any doc or sample code for using Libgnome-menu2 ?

2008-11-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 11 novembre 2008, à 09:46 +0800, Liu, Raymond a écrit : By the way, is there any other sample code or api doc available? 8 ) Hrm, there's no API documentation, that's quite bad :/ As for sample code, there's some code in gnome-panel using it. That being said, you can get a pretty good

Re: Any doc or sample code for using Libgnome-menu2 ?

2008-11-10 Thread Vincent Untz
to this function Which version of gnome-menus is this? It should have been fixed with: 2008-04-11 Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] * libmenu/menu-monitor.c: (register_monitor): call g_type_init() once since we're using gio in this file and so GObjects. Since

Re: how gnome panel handle submenu and app's show/non-show information?

2008-11-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 10 novembre 2008, à 18:25 +0800, Liu, Raymond a écrit : Hi My system is ubuntu 8.04 I check the /etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu, I can see that not all the submenu is actually show in the gnome-panel And also not all the app is show in each submenu or category. I can see that in

Re: GNOME 2.25.1 Released!

2008-11-07 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 07 novembre 2008, à 09:40 -0600, Jason D. Clinton a écrit : Why was Gnome Games omitted from the release notes? This was the worst possible release that could have been left out. There are more changes in dependencies and packaging in this release than any other point in my recent

Re: libunique external dependency for 2.25?

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008, à 23:23 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : while the ultimate goal *is* to have this functionality inside gtk+ I'm nowhere near having the time to integrate it myself - not in the way I want it integrated[1], at the very least. another issue is that libunique is

Re: libproxy as external dependency

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008, à 10:30 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum a écrit : Hi, I'd like to propose libproxy (LGPL 2.1+; http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/) as a blessed external dependency for GNOME 2.26. libproxy is currently used by vlc and neon and libsoup and webkit are considering

Re: libproxy as external dependency

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008, à 07:59 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum a écrit : Vincent Untz wrote: Le mardi 21 octobre 2008, à 10:30 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum a écrit : Hi, I'd like to propose libproxy (LGPL 2.1+; http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/) as a blessed external dependency

Re: libproxy as external dependency

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008, à 14:32 +0100, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What if the connection works in both cases, but the results are different? I would guess it's up to the application to know if the connection should

Re: libproxy as external dependency

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 21 octobre 2008, à 10:30 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum a écrit : Hi, I'd like to propose libproxy (LGPL 2.1+; http://code.google.com/p/libproxy/) as a blessed external dependency for GNOME 2.26. libproxy is currently used by vlc and neon and libsoup and webkit are considering

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008, à 14:53 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : Heya, I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26. Same comments as the ones I did for brasero :-) Please add gnome-user-share to the list at the top of http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop and

Re: new module proposal: brasero

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le samedi 01 novembre 2008, à 19:27 +0100, Philippe Rouquier a écrit : Hi, We'd be interested in having brasero integrated into the GNOME desktop. Please add brasero to the list at the top of http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop and also add it to gnome-suites-2.26.modules (below

Re: new module proposal: notification-daemon+libnotify

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008, à 10:57 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : I don't know how busy Christian is. But even if he is too busy to propose the module himself, I think it is time for us to be honest about the fact that it is pretty much impossible to use the desktop without

Re: Proposed external dependency: WebKit/GTK+

2008-11-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008, à 17:58 +0100, Richard Hult a écrit : Was there a conclusion on this at some point? I can't find anything in the archives. It would be great to be able to depend on it since I have some improvements in Devhelp trunk which needs WebKit. It was not ready for 2.24

Re: Cleanup tasks

2008-11-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 03 novembre 2008, à 13:24 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : Matthias Clasen wrote: - Continue the degnomification that is already off to a good start: http://live.gnome.org/LibgnomeMustDie We recently did this for gnome-settings-daemon, but it didn't help [1], because

Re: Prototyping the next generation panel?

2008-10-28 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008, à 15:20 +, Karl Lattimer a écrit : Columbiad - the cannon from the book From earth to the moon ? Interesting -- I had the same proposal :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing

Re: Prototyping the next generation panel?

2008-10-28 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 27 octobre 2008, à 16:58 -0700, Johannes Schmid a écrit : Hi! So after I finally got to read http://live.gnome.org/Boston2008/GUIHackfest/WindowManagementAndMore and vuntz blogpost I was wondering if there is already a place where the prototyping of the new panel is happening. I

Re: New module proposal: gnome-user-share

2008-10-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008, à 14:38 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit : Bastien already wrote about Fedora policy, httpd is disabled by default. I know that Debian policy is to consider that the user installing a server wants it to be started. From what I read of Patryk, PLD Linux also starts

Re: libunique external dependency for 2.25?

2008-10-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 01 octobre 2008, à 14:51 +0200, Alexander Larsson a écrit : I just commited some nautilus code to trunk (for 2.25) that makes use of libunique for unique application functionallity (replacing the previous code using bonobo-activation). However, libunique isn't currently a

Re: Testing dark themes and marking deprecated widgets

2008-10-02 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, à 15:19 +0200, Andrea Cimitan a écrit : 2008/9/30 Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] I like the idea. But I would guess distros would patch this out :/ Maybe we can do some opt-in thing, with a gconf key or a file somewhere in $HOME that would enable this kind

Re: Testing dark themes and marking deprecated widgets

2008-09-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, à 12:31 +0200, Benjamin Berg a écrit : Hello, There have been ideas to improve the desktop by modifying the themes to show problems in application. Specifically I am proposing to use a dark colour scheme for Clearlooks during the next unstable release cycle.

Re: Testing dark themes and marking deprecated widgets

2008-09-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, à 17:58 +0200, Benjamin Berg a écrit : On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 12:54 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, à 12:31 +0200, Benjamin Berg a écrit : Do you think that exposing deprecated widgets and theme related bugs like this is a good idea

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 12:24 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we get a precise list of affected applications? I only tripped over Inkscape so far but that's not part of GNOME and we'll likely patch

Re: GDM trunk will be used for GNOME 2.24.

2008-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 02:19 +0200, Andre Klapper a écrit : The release-team is going to use gdm trunk for GNOME 2.24. Note that most release-team members have mixed feelings. Entire discussion would have been less frustrating if gdm developers had been more responsible to the

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 16:50 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 12:24 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : Can we request a global freeze break permission to fix this and only this? Could

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 22 septembre 2008, à 16:56 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : And I've created patches for quite some modules: http://tmp.vuntz.net/adjustpatches/ accerciser.patch anjuta.patch dasher.patch deskbar-applet.patch eog.patch evolution.patch file-roller.patch gcalctool.patch

Modules with no stable release for 2.24.0

2008-09-22 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Here's a quick list of modules that seem to still only have an unstable release. If you want someone to release a tarball for you, please reply. evolution-webcal 2.23.91 gconf-editor 2.23.91 gnome-backgrounds 2.23.92 gnome-control-center 2.23.90 gnome-icon-theme

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-20 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 09:17 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : I don't see any way around discussing this with the GTK+ team before taking any decisions. I was hoping this would be discussed on gtk-devel-list and that a decision would have been taken there :/ If you think this is a

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 00:36 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 21:53 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] share]$ find . -name *.ui | xargs grep page_size You should look for glade files too, I guess. I've run this on my jhbuild of GNOME

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 22:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be possible to reconsider this change? That's somewhat a compatibility breakage and will create issues in lot of softwares. If the

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-19 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 10:36 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 00:36 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 21:53 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] share]$ find . -name *.ui | xargs grep page_size You should

Re: GDM version used for GNOME 2.24?

2008-09-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 17 septembre 2008, à 17:23 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit : Well...hmm...if I read the answers correctly, I think what I'm hearing is that there are a lot of great ideas, but they aren't done yet. If this is the case, then I think this sounds like a regression. I see nobody

Re: GTK adjustement changes create incompatible behaviour between versions?

2008-09-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 21:53 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit : [EMAIL PROTECTED] share]$ find . -name *.ui | xargs grep page_size You should look for glade files too, I guess. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. ___

Re: Updated GNOME 2.24 Showstopper Review

2008-09-18 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Here's a reminder about some showstoppers :-) I won't do a mail as good as Andre's mails (especially since I didn't update the status), but well, that should be enough. First, let's start with some new showstoppers: gvfsd-trash crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()

Re: GDM version used for GNOME 2.24?

2008-09-17 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 10 septembre 2008, à 09:39 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit : Hi: I asked this earlier, but I might have missed the response. Have the accessibility issues been resolved with the new GDM? In particular, does accessible login still work and do the keyboard/mouse/dwell gestures

Re: Debian-specific patches for the GNOME packages

2008-09-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008, à 10:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : Hi guys, it was already requested by a few people in the GNOME community to have a quick access to all patches distros apply. Since we now have a much better interface than the direct access to our svn repository, I think

Re: Debian-specific patches for the GNOME packages

2008-09-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008, à 16:16 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/9/11 Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Le jeudi 11 septembre 2008 à 09:01 -0400, Luis Villa a écrit : Is anybody regularly reviewing/triaging

Re: Bump gtk-vnc dependency

2008-09-08 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 05 septembre 2008, à 11:27 -0300, Jonh Wendell a écrit : Hi, folks. Can I update vinagre dependency on gtk-vnc to 0.3.7, which was released today[1]? This release fixes two vinagre bugs: - Support for scaling down[2]: I have a patch prepared for Vinagre since June, it's

Re: Bump gtk-vnc dependency

2008-09-08 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 08 septembre 2008, à 15:40 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit : On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 16:38 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le vendredi 05 septembre 2008, à 11:27 -0300, Jonh Wendell a écrit : Hi, folks. Can I update vinagre dependency on gtk-vnc to 0.3.7, which was released today[1

Re: GNOME 2.24 Showstopper Review

2008-09-01 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 01 septembre 2008, à 14:04 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl a écrit : Andre Klapper schrieb: GNOME 2.24.0 release is on September 22 (see [1]), and we still have enough 2.24 blocker bugs (and other bugs of course) to fix for everybody! Take a look, test help out, clean up our platform,

Re: Last of libgnomeprint dialog in GNOME

2008-08-11 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 11 août 2008, à 13:01 +0100, Ghee Teo a écrit : Hi, I found that ghex2 and gnome-dictionary (part of gnome-utils module) as in 2.23.4 tarballs still uses the obsoleted libgnomeprintui dialog, does anyone whether this is being worked on for GNOME 2.24 release or not to be

Re: pygtkosurceview branched for GNOME 2.22

2008-08-10 Thread Vincent Untz
Le dimanche 10 août 2008, à 01:01 +0200, Gil Forcada a écrit : Is there any mistake in DL or pygtksourceview isn't already there? In that case, it has to be in extras or in some set of a GNOME release? It doesn't contain any translatable string, AFAIK. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont

Re: libcanberra as an external dependency

2008-08-07 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi, Le jeudi 07 août 2008, à 11:59 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke a écrit : It seems to me there is a fundamental problem with adding libcanberra as an external dependency. It currently only supports ALSA and pulseaudio audio output. However, the default sounds daemon for GNOME is still

Re: Hamster string in the UI [was: New module decisions for 2.24]

2008-08-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 août 2008, à 14:21 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit : On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However I wonder if it wouldn't be best to avoid using Hamster in its UI (excepted in the about dialog), just like it was asked to the baobab team to

Re: Hamster string in the UI [was: New module decisions for 2.24]

2008-08-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 août 2008, à 15:33 +0200, Mathias Hasselmann a écrit : Am Mittwoch, den 06.08.2008, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Patryk Zawadzki: 2008/8/6 Alexander Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Time Tracker I went with Time Tracking Applet. AFAIR there was consensus to avoid the word Applet in UI

Re: random revision control proposal

2008-08-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 août 2008, à 19:34 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit : How about a whitelist for modules that are in the external dependencies set? I suggest: = Allowed = bzr hg git svn = Discouraged = cvs = Banned = Everything else, like darcs, monotone, etc. Telepathy, I'm

Re: random revision control proposal

2008-08-06 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mercredi 06 août 2008, à 19:54 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit : On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We only use tarballs for blessed external dependencies. So the vcs shouldn't matter. Right, this is for improving the developer/contributor experience

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >