On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Danilo egan wrote:
> Yesterday at 20:06, Chipzz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It's really ironic that you go through all the trouble to set up that
>> many different passwords, when every password is the same? How does that
>> improve security?
>> Ssh passphrases were intend
På Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:06:24PM +0200, Chipzz skrev:
> [snip]
> It's really ironic that you go through all the trouble to set up that
> many different passwords, when every password is the same? How does that
> improve security?
My passwords are not the same. Only my login password, the passwor
På Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:12:57PM +0200, Chipzz skrev:
> Yes, and it is an very stupid idea to use it. Reading those entries, it
> would appear you are just being lazy and care little about security.
What's wrong/insecure with unlocking your WLAN key on login?
> I don't see the point in saving y
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 20:06 +0200, Chipzz wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
>
> > På Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:12:57PM +0200, Chipzz skrev:
> >> Yes, and it is an very stupid idea to use it. Reading those entries, it
> >> would appear you are just being lazy and care little abou
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 20:06 +0200, Chipzz wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
>
> > På Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:12:57PM +0200, Chipzz skrev:
> >> Yes, and it is an very stupid idea to use it. Reading those entries, it
> >> would appear you are just being lazy and care little abou
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
På Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:12:57PM +0200, Chipzz skrev:
Yes, and it is an very stupid idea to use it. Reading those entries, it
would appear you are just being lazy and care little about security.
What's wrong/insecure with unlocking your WLAN key
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
På Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Alexander Larsson skrev:
Interesting. However, isn't there a small security value in protecting
just the fact that you have a password stored for a particular target?
And anyway, you need to unlock the keyri
På Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:41:58AM +0200, Alexander Larsson skrev:
> Interesting. However, isn't there a small security value in protecting
> just the fact that you have a password stored for a particular target?
> And anyway, you need to unlock the keyring at least, because all that
> information
