Re: [PATCH gnome-terminal] commit 3229 did actually break things

2009-05-15 Thread Christian Kirbach
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:14:12 +0200, Simon Hengel wrote: Hello, I guess commit 3229 breaks things. gconf_ping_daemon() gives 0, even if dbus is running. This means, that if there is no gconfd-2 instance around, gnome-terminal want start. If, with my system setup, I just reverse 3229, everythi

[PATCH gnome-terminal] commit 3229 did actually break things

2009-04-30 Thread Simon Hengel
Hello, I guess commit 3229 breaks things. gconf_ping_daemon() gives 0, even if dbus is running. This means, that if there is no gconfd-2 instance around, gnome-terminal want start. If, with my system setup, I just reverse 3229, everything is fine (== a gconfd-2 is started if not already running)