2012/2/24 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
That sounds great functionality. The webapp will file bugs in BZ and
attach patches to it? Or will maintainers have to go through the
webapp?
We can figure something out, for now it's just an idea, haven't thought of
the best way to implement it.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 18:08, Stefan Sauer enso...@hora-obscura.de wrote:
On 02/19/2012 03:41 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 12:48 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
Just one thought. If people work on a next generation doc tool to take
over from gtk-doc, please consider to do it
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:57, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/2/24 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
That sounds great functionality. The webapp will file bugs in BZ and
attach patches to it? Or will maintainers have to go through the
webapp?
We can figure something out, for now
On 02/23/2012 09:27 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
Well, this is not quite true Stefan,
Right now if you want to contribute to the docs you have to do quite a
bit of work (git+bugzilla workflow), even if you do this everyday, it
can be quite annoying and distracting to stop everything that you are
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 17:08 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
On 02/19/2012 03:41 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 12:48 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
Just one thought. If people work on a next generation doc tool to take
over from gtk-doc, please consider to do it without docbook xml
On 02/23/2012 04:18 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
snip
Honestly, I think all of us (me included) are getting too hung up on
the tools. What we really need is better writing. No amount of tool
development is going to save you from a lack of good content.
Agree, but one important part is that the
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Stefan Sauer enso...@hora-obscura.de wrote:
Honestly, I think all of us (me included) are getting too hung up on
the tools. What we really need is better writing. No amount of tool
development is going to save you from a lack of good content.
Agree, but one
Well, this is not quite true Stefan,
Right now if you want to contribute to the docs you have to do quite a bit
of work (git+bugzilla workflow), even if you do this everyday, it can be
quite annoying and distracting to stop everything that you are doing to
ammend documentation (opening a bug
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 21:27, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
Well, this is not quite true Stefan,
Right now if you want to contribute to the docs you have to do quite a bit
of work (git+bugzilla workflow), even if you do this everyday, it can be
quite annoying and distracting to stop
On 18 February 2012 07:47, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
...snip...
We started generating DocBook from GIR files, trying to mimic GTK-Doc
as much as possible. Progress was slow and we had quite some problems
trying to rescue the DocBook that is embedded in the C sources.
Shaun
On 02/19/2012 03:41 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 12:48 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
Just one thought. If people work on a next generation doc tool to take
over from gtk-doc, please consider to do it without docbook xml at
all.
Just go from an intermediate representation to
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 15:00 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I am interested in the dynamic features like doing complicated queries
to show the result and being able to add comments and code examples to
specific API items, writing code to output Mallard only helps if you
want to still produce
On 01/13/2012 02:17 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hi,
in a bit less than a month from now there will be a hackfest on
documentation in Brno [0]. Has anybody done any further work since
Berlin in generating API documentation in the Mallard format from the
GIR files?
I plan to spend my time there
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 12:48 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote:
Just one thought. If people work on a next generation doc tool to take
over from gtk-doc, please consider to do it without docbook xml at
all.
Just go from an intermediate representation to html *without* xslt.
libxslt is literally dead
2012/2/19 Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 15:00 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I am interested in the dynamic features like doing complicated queries
to show the result and being able to add comments and code examples to
specific API items, writing code to output Mallard
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 16:22, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/2/19 Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 15:00 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I am interested in the dynamic features like doing complicated queries
to show the result and being able to add comments and
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
Django has its own comments app, that problem is already solved.
And it's terrible. Speaking as someone who wrote the rating/comment
system using the Django comments app, it's terrible. Don't think of
adding any feature
2012/2/19 Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 16:22, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/2/19 Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 15:00 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I am interested in the dynamic features like doing complicated queries
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
I think that a tool to convert the doc string into something
C/Python/Vala/GJS friendly (with links to each node) would be nice. If it
had some sort of integration with the AST it would be nice so that we could
somehow
2012/2/18 Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 16:33, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/1/27 Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org
Hello guys,
Just for the record, I've started coding a small django app in github to
see how far can I get with regards a richer
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 16:33, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
2012/1/27 Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org
Hello guys,
Just for the record, I've started coding a small django app in github to
see how far can I get with regards a richer API reference web interface.
I'm reusing Mikkael
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 09:49 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 23:30, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 14:17 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hi,
in a bit less than a month from now there will be a hackfest on
documentation in Brno [0]. Has anybody
Hello guys,
Just for the record, I've started coding a small django app in github to
see how far can I get with regards a richer API reference web interface.
I'm reusing Mikkael Kampstrup's giraffe[1] AST code for GIR and I'm
translating that to a django data model (SQL) structure.
There are two
2012/1/27 Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org
Hello guys,
Just for the record, I've started coding a small django app in github to
see how far can I get with regards a richer API reference web interface.
I'm reusing Mikkael Kampstrup's giraffe[1] AST code for GIR and I'm
translating that to a
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 14:17 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hi,
in a bit less than a month from now there will be a hackfest on
documentation in Brno [0]. Has anybody done any further work since
Berlin in generating API documentation in the Mallard format from the
GIR files?
I don't think
Hi,
in a bit less than a month from now there will be a hackfest on
documentation in Brno [0]. Has anybody done any further work since
Berlin in generating API documentation in the Mallard format from the
GIR files?
I plan to spend my time there on this, so would be great if I can
avoid stepping
26 matches
Mail list logo
