There are a few changes in Bugzilla that I want to spam everyone about.
One is a patch report, the other changes are in the handling of
bug-buddy reports.
When you are drowning in bugspam wouldn't it be nice to get an easy
overview of your patches? Perhaps an overview of patches that need
reviewin
Hey,
Nice work :-)
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 00:39 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> 3. Already fixed (duplicate)
>Some crashers have been fixed a long time ago, but they still receive
>daily bugreports. These bugreports can now be rejected automatically.
>For this the first 5 function
3. Already fixed (duplicate)
Some crashers have been fixed a long time ago, but they still receive
daily bugreports. These bugreports can now be rejected automatically.
For this the first 5 functions of the stacktrace are used, coupled
with the GNOME version (to prevent regressions be
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 11:15 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>3. Already fixed (duplicate)
> >> Some crashers have been fixed a long time ago, but they still receive
> >> daily bugreports. These bugreports can now be rejected automatically.
> >> For this the first 5 functions of the st
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:13:28AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 00:39 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
>
> > 3. Already fixed (duplicate)
> >Some crashers have been fixed a long time ago, but they still receive
> >daily bugreports. These bugreports can now be rejected au
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:29:55AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 11:15 +0100, Bill Haneman wrote:
[..]
> > I suspect this heuristic would fail for a number of at-spi/accessibility
> > bugs as well, since the stack frames (especially in non-debug builds)
> > can look the sa
If this happens, just please make sure to handle mono's gdb stacktraces
specially, which all look like this...
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found)
(no debugging symbols found
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 17:25 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> In the near future I want to make this for open bugs as well. For those
> I haven't decided if either a comment should be added to the original
> bug, or to create a new bug and dupe it right away.
>
Please create a new bug and dupe it. Th
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:06:17AM -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
> If this happens, just please make sure to handle mono's gdb stacktraces
> specially, which all look like this...
Do you mean rejection of bugs based on the stacktrace? It already
works. No bugs rejected yet though.
> (no debu
Le mercredi 15 juin 2005 à 17:25 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 08:13:28AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 00:39 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >
> > > 3. Already fixed (duplicate)
> > >Some crashers have been fixed a long time ago, but they still
10 matches
Mail list logo
