Hi,
Sorry, I only read the description section of Andres link¹ and not to
the bottom with obviously your post.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T40010
This is mostly I expected here as answer.
Thanks for your patience
Menner - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Menner
Am 18.01.2015 09:
Hello Andre and Eduard.
There have been diffrents efforts on Wikipedia, WMF&co to push SVG
support. All of them look quite dead now and no one has ever directly
talked to our tool provider.
Am 18.01.2015 01:58, schrieb Eduard Braun:
1. Get a WMF developer to work (at least part time) on ma
[offtopic; please remove d-d-l@ in case of answering this]
Hi Eduard,
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 01:58 +0100, Eduard Braun wrote:
> With your Wikimedia hat ON:
> Could you encourage the right people at WMF
You can encourage the target audience as much as I can in
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T40
Hi André,
thank you for you open and honest words. That's sadly what I observed, too.
So anybody who feels fit to step in as maintainer and bring back some
life into the project could be sure of my gratitude!
Am 18.01.2015 um 01:06 schrieb Andre Klapper:
Speaking as a non-programmer & GNOME vo
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 18:14 +0100, Michael Brenner wrote:
> I'm searching for information about the future of libRSVG.
[...]
> As libRSVG is missing some major features defined by SVG standard there
> are some anoying pitfalls. Here I'm asking for a statement what
Hello Gnomers and especially ChPe!
The front page of the libRSVG project¹ guided me to this mailing list.
I'm searching for information about the future of libRSVG. Background of
my interrest is that I'm a volunteering author of german languaged
Wikipedia. The software MediaWik
