On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:52 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
If a program works correctly with Python 2.4, is there
actually a danger of it not working correctly with 2.5?
That sounds broken.
Python 2.4 and 2.5 install in parallel so already-built applications
will not be broken.
But if you choose
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 14:23 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
[snip]
You should always test with your minimum requirements.
[snip]
It's not that simple. Some (fairly minor) changes are needed to make
things build with Python 2.5. We already know that they build with
Python 2.4. They need to build with
On 3/14/07, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:52 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
If a program works correctly with Python 2.4, is there
actually a danger of it not working correctly with 2.5?
That sounds broken.
Python 2.4 and 2.5 install in parallel so
On Qua, 2007-03-14 at 13:18 +0200, Fernando Herrera wrote:
On 3/14/07, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:52 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
If a program works correctly with Python 2.4, is there
actually a danger of it not working correctly with 2.5?
That
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 09:48 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:52 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
I worry that this move would result in programmers using
2.5-only features. Our intrepid testers wouldn't notice,
because they're building from jhbuild. But we'd create
an
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 09:50 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 14:23 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
[snip]
You should always test with your minimum requirements.
[snip]
It's not that simple. Some (fairly minor) changes are needed to make
things build with Python 2.5. We
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
I'd like to suggest updating jhbuild to install Python 2.5 instead of
2.4 for GNOME 2.20, because:
* I don't think Python 2.4 will continue to be maintained;
* Distributions that will receive GNOME 2.20 will most likely make
python
On Ter, 2007-03-13 at 09:42 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
I'd like to suggest updating jhbuild to install Python 2.5 instead of
2.4 for GNOME 2.20, because:
* I don't think Python 2.4 will continue to be maintained;
* Distributions
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 18:02 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
I'd like to suggest updating jhbuild to install Python 2.5 instead of
2.4 for GNOME 2.20, because:
* I don't think Python 2.4 will continue to be maintained;
* Distributions that will receive GNOME 2.20 will most likely
On 3/13/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
I'd like to suggest updating jhbuild to install Python 2.5 instead of
2.4 for GNOME 2.20, because:
* I don't think Python 2.4 will continue to be maintained;
* Distributions that
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 09:42 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:cies?
(While we're at it: Debian still has Python 2.4 as default.)
Debian/unstable also still has GNOME 2.14.
--
Michael R. Head [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.suppressingfire.org/~burner/
http://suppressingfire.livejournal.com
smime.p7s
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Michael R. Head wrote:
Debian/unstable also still has GNOME 2.14.
But can jhbuild GNOME 2.16 and 2.18.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 17:26 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Michael R. Head wrote:
Debian/unstable also still has GNOME 2.14.
But can jhbuild GNOME 2.16 and 2.18.
Just like you can compile python 2.5 ;)
___
desktop-devel-list
On Ter, 2007-03-13 at 16:57 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Elijah Newren wrote:
Unlike GNOME and Linux, Python does not use odd version numbers for
development versions. Thus 2.5 is the latest production version of
Python, rather than the latest development version.
I
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 17:38 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Ter, 2007-03-13 at 16:57 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Elijah Newren wrote:
Unlike GNOME and Linux, Python does not use odd version numbers for
development versions. Thus 2.5 is the latest production
On Ter, 2007-03-13 at 12:52 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 17:38 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Ter, 2007-03-13 at 16:57 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Elijah Newren wrote:
Unlike GNOME and Linux, Python does not use odd version numbers for
On 3/13/07, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Michael R. Head wrote:
Debian/unstable also still has GNOME 2.14.
But can jhbuild GNOME 2.16 and 2.18.
...and would still be able to even if it only had Python 2.3 installed
by default: jhbuild builds python as part of
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 18:11 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Ter, 2007-03-13 at 12:52 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 17:38 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Ter, 2007-03-13 at 16:57 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Elijah Newren wrote:
I'd like to suggest updating jhbuild to install Python 2.5 instead of
2.4 for GNOME 2.20, because:
* I don't think Python 2.4 will continue to be maintained;
* Distributions that will receive GNOME 2.20 will most likely make
python 2.5 the default (ubuntu already does for GNOME 2.18);
*
This link may be enlightening:
http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.4.4/
-Joseph
==
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 18:02 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
I'd like to suggest updating jhbuild to install Python
20 matches
Mail list logo
