Re: GNOME 3.0 Blocker Report for week 03

2011-01-18 Thread Xan Lopez
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > epiphany: Port Epiphany to GtkApplication > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637334 Hmm, how is this a blocker? > > epiphany: Port EphyNetMonitor to GDBus > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624421 Or this one? Certain

Re: GNOME 3.0 Blocker Report for week 03

2011-01-18 Thread PiƱeiro
From: Andre Klapper > gnome-shell: Require a way to load the accessibility modules > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612599 > > gnome-shell: StLabel doesn't expose any accessibility information > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=626658 > > gnome-shell: [PATCH] Required acce

Re: GNOME 3.0 Blocker Report for week 03

2011-01-17 Thread Milan Crha
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 22:09 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > Evolution-Data-Server: Port to GSettings > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635379 Hi, Matt answered in yours thread "GNOME 3.0 Blocker Report for week 01" that this one will not be done on time (I understood his reply th

GNOME 3.0 Blocker Report for week 03

2011-01-17 Thread Andre Klapper
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set): https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&cf_gnome_target=3.0 [Compared to the last one I removed the 3.0 target for python introspecti