Re: GitHub Development Platform for GNOME

Hi. On So, 2017-04-09 at 15:44 -0400, Walter Vargas wrote: > > Canonical's recent decision about not maintaining unity for Ubuntu makes it > quite clear that Desktop is not the priority anymore, IoT and Mobile are the > priority now, Hah. Before it was the Cloud™, SOA, IVI, other form factors,

Re: GitHub Development Platform for GNOME

On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 14:09 -0400, Nicolas Dufresne wrote: > Le lundi 10 avril 2017 à 01:25 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit : > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Walter Vargas > co > > m> wrote: > > > I want to share my humble opinion and thoughts about > > > GitHub/GitLab:

Re: GitHub Development Platform for GNOME

Le lundi 10 avril 2017 à 01:25 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit : > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Walter Vargas m> wrote: > > I want to share my humble opinion and thoughts about GitHub/GitLab: > > > > From what I've been hearing, people within GNOME have been

Re: GitHub Development Platform for GNOME

the path we should lead. Best regards, Carlos Soriano Original Message Subject: GitHub Development Platform for GNOME Local Time: April 9, 2017 9:44 PM UTC Time: April 9, 2017 7:44 PM From: waltervar...@linux.com To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org I want to share my humble opinion

Re: GitHub Development Platform for GNOME

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:14 AM, Walter Vargas wrote: > I want to share my humble opinion and thoughts about GitHub/GitLab: > >From what I've been hearing, people within GNOME have been evaluating the possibility of running our own GitLab instance, so I would wait and see

GitHub Development Platform for GNOME

I want to share my humble opinion and thoughts about GitHub/GitLab: I get worried about the long-term viability of the GNOME project after running an iteration over OODA Loop (observe, orient, decide, act)[1]. Canonical's recent decision about not maintaining unity for Ubuntu makes it quite