Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>
>>Vincent Untz wrote:
>>
>>>Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>>>
>>>
to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
on that ?
>>>
>>>Straight question: if we integrate an interfac
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
>> on that ?
>
> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
> can we choose between glade, gazpacho and s
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Vincent Untz wrote:
>> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>>
>>> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
>>> on that ?
>> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
>> can we cho
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>
>>to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
>>on that ?
>
> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
> can we choose between glade, gazpacho and
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
>> on that ?
>
> Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
> can we choose between glade, gazpacho and s
Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
> to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
> on that ?
Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic?
Vincent
--
Les gens
Naba Kumar wrote:
> Hi guys, [starting a new thread]
[...]
> The website is kind of outdated, but I believe we can revive it and make
> some real effort this time. A mailing list was also setup for the group
> called gnome-devtools(@)gnome.org. I guess it is still used by some
> people (e.g. devhel
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 10:08 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Davyd Madeley wrote:
> [...]
>
> >>We should *totally* have a developer tools suite.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I agree.
> >
> >
> Well that makes 3 of us :) so I went ahead and created a wiki page
> http://live.gnome.org/DevelTools so
Hi guys, [starting a new thread]
Tristian wrote:
>>We should *totally* have a developer tools suite.
>>
>I agree.
>
> Well that makes 3 of us :) so I went ahead and created a wiki page
> http://live.gnome.org/DevelTools so we can see what happens, other
> interested module maintainers that th
Davyd Madeley wrote:
[...]
>>We should *totally* have a developer tools suite.
>>
>>
>
>I agree.
>
>
Well that makes 3 of us :) so I went ahead and created a wiki page
http://live.gnome.org/DevelTools so we can see what happens, other
interested module maintainers that think thier module
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 19:46 -0700, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > I just wrote this mail up because I read
> > http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner and thought to notify all the
> > relevent lists. Worthy of note is that I am writing d-d-l but glade is not
> > part of the gnome desktop module group
> I just wrote this mail up because I read
> http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner and thought to notify all the
> relevent lists. Worthy of note is that I am writing d-d-l but glade is not
> part of the gnome desktop module group - while I do have some ideas on
> that matter I dont feel like w
Hi all,
we've just branched stable development of Glade 3 into the
glade3-3-0-branch,
this branch is pretty much feature frozen and will only be updated with
bugfixes.
In HEAD we will be focusing on the UI in this cycle, the embedded window UI
that Vincent Geddes has been working on will ape
13 matches
Mail list logo
