Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

2007-04-18 Thread Elijah Newren
Hi all, So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding such modules as time has gone on, but there are still lots of existing modules like

Re: Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

2007-04-18 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi all, > > So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with > a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow > the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding > such modules as

Re: Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

2007-04-18 Thread Elijah Newren
On 4/18/07, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pango totally follows GNOME's release cycle. > > Dasher does too as far as I remember. I updated the page. Thanks for the correction. /me waits for the flood of other clarifications and corrections Elijah _

Re: Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Murray Cumming
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi all, > > So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with > a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow > the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding > such modules as

Re: Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Torsten Schoenfeld
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > It'd be really helpful if people could read over my initial draft and > provide corrections and clarifications: > > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/SeparateReleaseCycleModules The list says that "the entire perl bindings suite" is

Re: Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Elijah Newren
On 4/19/07, Torsten Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > > > It'd be really helpful if people could read over my initial draft and > > provide corrections and clarifications: > > > > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/SeparateRelease

Re: Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Willie Walker
For gnome-speech: it's mostly in maintenance mode, with drivers for new speech engines to be added over time. When something changes in gnome-speech, I tend make a new release of gnome-speech to coincide with the next point release of whatever happens to be coming out (i.e., either even or odd),

Re: Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

2007-04-19 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:41 -0400, Willie Walker wrote: > The current version of gnome-speech is 0.4.11, with the '0' in there to > indicate a lack of courage to just call it 1.0. :-) In general (not > just for gnome-speech), I sure find it confusing to know which versions > of which modules go

Re: Information needed: Modules in official GNOME releases but not on the official release cycle

2007-04-22 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi all, > > So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with > a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow > the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding > such modules as