Il giorno ven, 09/11/2007 alle 16.58 -0600, Jonathon Jongsma ha scritto:
> On 11/9/07, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Are the current drawbacks of using autotools in GNOME so so so
> > annoying that it would be really worth the effort of migrating to
> > something else?
>
> The only
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 00:43 +0100, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
[snip]
> we need some proper documentation
> explaining how the GNOME stack is built,
jhbuild should take care of building. There is a lot of information
about how to use jhbuild, including solving specific problems on
specific distros.
On 10/11/2007, Matteo Settenvini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno ven, 09/11/2007 alle 16.58 -0600, Jonathon Jongsma ha scritto:
> > On 11/9/07, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - Are the current drawbacks of using autotools in GNOME so so so
> > > annoying that it would be re
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> * GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have standard
> knowledge of C# or Java
you know you don't have to use GObjects with C, right? you can write
native C# and Java applications.
> * Autotools are exceptionally har
On Nov 10, 2007 7:41 AM, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>
> > * GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have standard
> > knowledge of C# or Java
>
> you know you don't have to use GObjects with C, right? you ca
On 10/11/2007, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>
> > * GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have standard
> > knowledge of C# or Java
>
> you know you don't have to use GObjects with C, right? you can write
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 14:41 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
>
> > * GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have standard
> > knowledge of C# or Java
>
> you know you don't have to use GObjects with C, right? you can write
On Nov 9, 2007 11:43 PM, Matteo Settenvini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would like to discuss with you where we could act seriously in this
> direction. I've got some comments to make:
>
It sounds like at this stage some input from people who have found the
learning curve prohibitive might be
hi;
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 23:33 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> On 10/11/2007, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 15:06 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
> wrote:
>
> > * GObjects are conceptually difficult when you have
>
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 00:37 +, Who wrote:
[snip]
> Here are my thoughts:
>
> 1. What do you use to code!? What do I need on my system to do
> this?--
>
> Coding on Windows makes you soft, especially if you used something
> like Visual Studio. There will be a huge number
Just a quickie since the kids are screaming :-) : I started a wiki page to
collect the status of this discussion: http://live.gnome.org/EasyGnome
If I missed anything please comment. Heck please comment anyways.
Cheers,
Mikkel
___
desktop-devel-list mai
11 matches
Mail list logo
