On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > Note that the userid is really important. Otherwise ensure that the
> > E-mail address is the one your @svn.g.o alias forwards to.
>
> I've made an pre-commit script wh
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > Note that the userid is really important. Otherwise ensure that the
> > > E-mail address is the one your @sv
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 04:20:04PM -0400, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > > Note that the userid is really imp
Le vendredi 31 août 2007, à 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > Note that the userid is really important. Otherwise ensure that the
> > > E-mail address is the one
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 11:17:40PM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 31 août 2007, à 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > > Note that the userid is reall
Le samedi 01 septembre 2007, à 00:02 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> > Does it also make it impossible for translators to commit? If yes, can
> > we postpone this to after 2.20.0?
>
> Depends on what you are asking. Someone interpreted this as
> "you have to be in MAINTAINERS or you cannot commit
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 09:21:10AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le samedi 01 septembre 2007, à 00:02 +0200, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> > Further, anyone can commit a proper MAINTAINERS file. As soon that is
> > done all commits will work (you could even combine the MAINTAINERS
> > commit with a bug f
On Sex, 2007-08-31 at 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > Note that the userid is really important. Otherwise ensure that the
> > > E-mail address is the one your @sv
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 01:20:08PM +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> On Sex, 2007-08-31 at 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > > Note that the userid is r
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > Note that the userid is really important. Otherwise ensure that the
> > > E-mail address is the one your @s
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 04:06:07PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 19:55 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:55:35AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:36:28AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > > > Note that the userid is really im
> I do understand this is heavy handed way of getting that information.
I'd suggest the heavy-handedness is just mistimed -- it would be totally OK
to announce that this would happen immediately *after* the release of 2.20,
as then it would simply be a property of the next release cycle. Doing i
On 9/1/07, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > I do understand this is heavy handed way of getting that information.
>
> I'd suggest the heavy-handedness is just mistimed -- it would be totally OK
> to announce that this would happen immediately *after* the release of 2.20,
> as then it
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 21:39 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> I'm with Jeff and Vincent on this; I'm worried about the adverse
> affect this could have on the release, given how close it is. Can we
> consider delaying it until after 2.20 is out?
How hard would it be for someone to intersect all th
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:42:44PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 21:39 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> >
> > I'm with Jeff and Vincent on this; I'm worried about the adverse
> > affect this could have on the release, given how close it is. Can we
> > consider delaying it unt
> > > I'm with Jeff and Vincent on this; I'm worried about the adverse
> > > affect this could have on the release, given how close it is. Can we
> > > consider delaying it until after 2.20 is out?
>
> I can delay; just tell me so clearly. Then it will be Dec/Jan ish for the
> new system. Howev
man, 03.09.2007 kl. 08.09 +0200, skrev Olav Vitters:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 11:42:44PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 21:39 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm with Jeff and Vincent on this; I'm worried about the adverse
> > > affect this could have on the rele
On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 16:53 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > > > I'm with Jeff and Vincent on this; I'm worried about the adverse
> > > > affect this could have on the release, given how close it is. Can we
> > > > consider delaying it until after 2.20 is out?
> >
> > I can delay; just tell me
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 11:01:08AM +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
> man, 03.09.2007 kl. 08.09 +0200, skrev Olav Vitters:
> > Assuming 'jhbuild list' gives the SVN name (might not be true):
> > gnome-doc-utils, nautilus, gnome-themes, libxml2, zenity,
> > gnome-netstatus, libart_lgpl, gnome-backgr
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:48:41AM -0400, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-03 at 16:53 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> >
> > > > > I'm with Jeff and Vincent on this; I'm worried about the adverse
> > > > > affect this could have on the release, given how close it is. Can we
> > > > > consid
On 9/3/07, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> New list of missing modules (again, by comparing with jhbuild list):
> gamin, libxml2, zenity, libsigc++2, libart_lgpl, libxslt
Wow, I figured the list would be far larger and not drop so quickly
either. That's a small enough list that I'm not
> On 9/3/07, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > New list of missing modules (again, by comparing with jhbuild list):
> > gamin, libxml2, zenity, libsigc++2, libart_lgpl, libxslt
Of these, only zenity has translations, righ? Lucas?
Are all the others unmaintained? Looks so to me. li
> On 9/3/07, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > New list of missing modules (again, by comparing with jhbuild list):
> > gamin, libxml2, zenity, libsigc++2, libart_lgpl, libxslt
>
> Wow, I figured the list would be far larger and not drop so quickly
> either. That's a small enough list
Hi,
2007/9/3, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > On 9/3/07, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > New list of missing modules (again, by comparing with jhbuild list):
> > > gamin, libxml2, zenity, libsigc++2, libart_lgpl, libxslt
>
> Of these, only zenity has translations, righ?
Could you please turn this off now? I can't commit to either libsigc++
(I emailed you about that already) or gconfmm. For instance:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/svn/gnome220/gconfmm$ more MAINTAINERS
Murray Cumming
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Userid: murrayc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/svn/gnome220/gconfmm$ svn com
Murray Cumming wrote:
> Could you please turn this off now? I can't commit to either libsigc++
> (I emailed you about that already) or gconfmm. For instance:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/svn/gnome220/gconfmm$ more MAINTAINERS
> Murray Cumming
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Userid: murrayc
It's in the w
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 12:02 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Could you please turn this off now? I can't commit to either libsigc++
> > (I emailed you about that already) or gconfmm. For instance:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/svn/gnome220/gconfmm$ more MAINTAINERS
> > Murray
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:09:59PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 12:02 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> > Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > Could you please turn this off now? I can't commit to either libsigc++
> > > (I emailed you about that already) or gconfmm. For instance:
I th
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 23:41 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:09:59PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Yes, gnomemm has no top-level trunk/ directory, and I don't want to add
> > one because that would cause confusion.
>
> Ok.. seems you have a very weird SVN repos structure
Hi,
Daniel took care of his (libxml, libxslt, gamin)
--Ray
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Veillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 4, 2007 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: MAINTAINERS in svn -- have it or no commit for you
To: Ray Strode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon,
30 matches
Mail list logo
