Thanks everyone for your input. I've decided to go with GTK+ for now
because it seems the most supported and integrate-able with GNOME. It's
python binding is also quit easy to use.
My next choice would be wxwidgets.
Thanks,
--
Marco Scannadinari
___
Hello,
On 02/14/2013 01:44 AM, Robert Bruce Park wrote:
That is true, wxwidgets does allow your application to look like a
native application between OSX, windows, and Gtk, and Qt. The problem
with wxwidgets is that it is a subset of all systems, so you don't get
the full power of Gtk, you just
hi;
On 14 February 2013 16:43, Marco Scannadinari wrote:
> Qt is an entirely unrelated toolkit, it has nothing to do with Gtk.
> Yes, that is true. It's not necessarily GTK I intend to use, although
> that is what I would *like*.
> Taking into consideration which is the easiest to learn,
Qt is an entirely unrelated toolkit, it has nothing to do with Gtk.
Yes, that is true. It's not necessarily GTK I intend to use, although
that is what I would *like*.
Taking into consideration which is the easiest to learn, and which will
be able to target the most users, Qt seems like a go
> Well if you want to write applications for GNOME, you should use Gtk:
>
> https://python-gtk-3-tutorial.readthedocs.org/en/latest/index.html
>
There used to be a wonderfull pygtk all-in-one installer for Windows,
but now, with pygi, I failed to find one. I know it's possible to use
pygi on Win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-02-13 02:44 PM, Marco Scannadinari wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> What are your recommendations for a toolkit that is best suited to
> GNOME app development (obviously GTK+3), but also useful in
> developing apps for other distros / OSs - I feel that the g
Hi,
What are your recommendations for a toolkit that is best suited to GNOME
app development (obviously GTK+3), but also useful in developing apps
for other distros / OSs - I feel that the general suggestion is Qt.
Others have said even wxWidgets, because it draws native widgets
according to the en
