On 7 Jan 2011, at 17:47, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 18:37 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>>> In particular, note the following mailing lists:
>>>
>>>* gnome-annouce-list - all software announcements
>>>* gnome-list - discussions/questions about how to use GNOME
>
> Does g
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Olav, as list maintainer, what do you think? Do you need moderator
> volunteers to share the load, or is the current moderator team sufficient?
I'll follow whatever is best according to the intended audience of the
list. This including
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to propose that we move the list to strict moderation for the
>> next couple of months - anything not to do with development (code, docs,
>> i18n, continuous integration) related to GNOME 3 should be filtered out.
>> Priority sh
>
>
> I'd like to propose that we move the list to strict moderation for the
> next couple of months - anything not to do with development (code, docs,
> i18n, continuous integration) related to GNOME 3 should be filtered out.
> Priority should be given to maintainers & developers and people doing
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 18:37 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> > In particular, note the following mailing lists:
> >
> > * gnome-annouce-list - all software announcements
> > * gnome-list - discussions/questions about how to use GNOME
Does gnome-list cover the design process of user experience?
Hi,
Owen Taylor wrote:
>> I'd like to propose that we move the list to strict moderation for the
>> next couple of months - anything not to do with development (code, docs,
>> i18n, continuous integration) related to GNOME 3 should be filtered out.
>> Priority should be given to maintainers & deve
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 11:16 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> GNOME maintainers & developers need a place to co-ordinate efforts
> running up to GNOME 3.0, co-ordinate which bugs are blockers, which
> features & modules need work and who's working on them, etc.
>
> This (the desktop *devel* list
Hi,
GNOME maintainers & developers need a place to co-ordinate efforts
running up to GNOME 3.0, co-ordinate which bugs are blockers, which
features & modules need work and who's working on them, etc.
This (the desktop *devel* list) is the best place for that to happen,
but the list is far too noi
