Hi,
The original proposal:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-March/msg00318.html
GNOME Journal article:
http://gnomejournal.org/article/56/exercising-your-application-with-accerciser
--lucasr
2007/7/31, Andre Klapper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You can learn about accerciser
I fully support the inclusion of accerciser. Members of the Orca team
have been using it with good success, and it's accessible to boot.
Furthermore, the maintainer(s) have migrated it to the new pyatspi
bindings, which alleviates any concerns I had.
Will
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 23:09 +0200,
Is this a replacement of at-poke?
Li
在 2007-07-30一的 23:09 +0200，Andre Klapper写道：
You can learn about accerciser here:
http://live.gnome.org/Accerciser
It uses Gnome CVS, is i18n-enabled, and uses gnome-doc-utils.
Total of 157 UI messages, with 17 trunk UI Translations above 50%.
The
quote who=Li Yuan
Is this a replacement of at-poke?
In many ways, yes -- though at-poke is not currently included in any of the
release suites.
- Jeff
--
Open Source in Mobile 2007: Madrid, Spain http://www.osimconference.com/
Debugging is at least twice as hard as programming. If
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:12 -0400, Peter Parente wrote:
In essence, Accerciser is a next generation at-poke tool
(http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/at-poke). The primary features of
Accerciser are the following:
FWIW, from an at-poke perspective I'd very much support the inclusion
of
Hi Elijah,
- Add Accerciser to the proposed module list at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNineteen/DevelTools
- Add Accerciser to the meta-gnome-proposed section of the
gnome-suites-2.20.modules moduleset (or find a volunteer to do so)
- Ping the GARNOME mailing list about the new proposed
Pete - I see that the accerciser module still uses a *.zip file of code
zipped up from LSR. This seems a little strange to me. For GNOME 2.20,
I think it is important to get rid of this *.zip file and migrate to the
new 'official' Python bindings for AT-SPI that you and I are working on
for
We migrate as soon as the bindings are available, but today they're
vaporware. We are using the pyLinAcc module from LSR as a short term
solution.
Is the concern that we're using a funky zip file? Or that we're using
a part of LSR?
The only reason why it's in a zip is to prevent edits to
We migrate as soon as the bindings are available, but today they're
vaporware. We are using the pyLinAcc module from LSR as a short term
solution.
Understood. I think it should be a requirement to get the bindings in
for GNOME 2.20, and have accerciser be the poster child for their use,
Understood. I think it should be a requirement to get the bindings in
for GNOME 2.20, and have accerciser be the poster child for their use,
though. LSR, Orca, Dogtail, and LDTP could eventually migrate to them
for GNOME 2.22.
Exactly. I've already asked Eitan (Accerciser devel) to take the
On 4/3/07, Peter Parente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for creating it. One question. Did you intend to give the
Bugzilla module a capital A in Accerciser? It appears to break
from the Bugzilla naming convention. Plus our svn module name is
accerciser. Will that cause a problem with the
Thanks for the fix and sorry for the confusion.
Pete
On 4/3/07, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/3/07, Peter Parente [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for creating it. One question. Did you intend to give the
Bugzilla module a capital A in Accerciser? It appears to break
from the
== Purpose
Accerciser (http://live.gnome.org/Accerciser) is an interactive Python
accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop. It uses AT-SPI to
inspect and control widgets, allowing a developer to check if an
application is providing correct information to assistive technologies
and automated
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the thorough proposal. There are three more small steps,
though, as per http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing:
- Add Accerciser to the proposed module list at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNineteen/DevelTools
- Add Accerciser to the meta-gnome-proposed
14 matches
Mail list logo
