Re: RFC: documentation browser

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:37 PM wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:31 AM Giovanni Campagna < > scampa.giova...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [...] >> > Also, it seems the parameter naming and listing is wrong/confusing for >> out parameters and for arrays (I haven't checked

Re: RFC: documentation browser

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: My opinion, which some of you know -- is that we should just get rid of the crazy overrides and just have helper modules for those. Gio.DBus is my least favorite of all of these. The point of docs is not to

Re: RFC: documentation browser

Hi Philip! On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:08 PM, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've been working on a documentation browser for documentation generated from GObject introspection files. Besides good old DevHelp on the desktop, there are several good online open-source documentation

Re: RFC: documentation browser

On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 07:08 +, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote: > Currently this is just for Javascript docs. We already have decent C, > Python, and Vala docs hosted elsewhere, but it wouldn't be too hard > to > modify this setup to include all four languages. Great, our JS documentation was

Re: RFC: documentation browser

My opinion, which some of you know -- is that we should just get rid of the crazy overrides and just have helper modules for those. Gio.DBus is my least favorite of all of these. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Giovanni Campagna wrote: > Hi Philip! > > On Tue, Jan 5,

RFC: documentation browser

Hi, I've been working on a documentation browser for documentation generated from GObject introspection files. Besides good old DevHelp on the desktop, there are several good online open-source documentation browsers that already exist, and one of them is DevDocs [1] which has lots of nifty