On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 21:34 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> I am asking the people's opinion about the general
> strategy in treating non-linux systems. Or, perhaps, "officially"
> admitting that we do not have a policy here - just decide on
> case-by-case basis.
It pretty much has to be done on a
> In this particular case, I'm the one who removed the code. To be honest,
> I'm not even sure that changing the keyboard model would have been all
> that useful on any slightly recent Unix-like OSes.
As far as I know, on other OSes it was, because they do not have
evdev. But of course the input fr
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 16:23 +, Sergey Udaltsov wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Yesterday, the code supporting choosing xkb model was removed from
> control center - because on linux all keycodes are based on evdev
> (techically correct statement - but only for linux) and noone really
> cares about geome
Hi folks
Yesterday, the code supporting choosing xkb model was removed from control
center - because on linux all keycodes are based on evdev (techically
correct statement - but only for linux) and noone really cares about
geometry.
Is there official policy related to supporting gnome on non-linu