On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 13:14 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008, à 14:53 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > Heya,
> >
> > I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
>
> Same comments as the ones I did for brasero :-)
>
> Please add gnome-user-share to the l
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008, à 14:53 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> Heya,
>
> I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
Same comments as the ones I did for brasero :-)
Please add gnome-user-share to the list at the top of
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop and
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 03:06 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> 2008/10/24 Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 21:11 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> >> Isn't that what nfs does? Or for that matter, ftp? I don't understand
> >> why a web server is needed for sharing files.
> >
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 13:22 +, Frej Soya wrote:
> Bastien Nocera hadess.net> writes:
>
> >
> > Heya,
> >
> > I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
> snip..
> >
> > We're also looking into integrating Frank Scholz' UPNP sharing work (see
> > http://coherence.beebit
Bastien Nocera hadess.net> writes:
>
> Heya,
>
> I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
snip..
>
> We're also looking into integrating Frank Scholz' UPNP sharing work (see
> http://coherence.beebits.net/wiki/Nautilus).
This would be really cool, especially if it makes
2008-10-25 klockan 03:06 skrev BJörn Lindqvist:
> Also, I would like to mount the shares like you can with samba and nfs
> shares. But I assume that is out of scope for g-u-s.
Afaik gvfs has quite decent WebDAV support.
— Wouter
--
:wq mail
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 15:34 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 24.10.08 20:14, Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Contrary to what the name suggest, lighttpd is not just a lightweight
> >> web serv
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24.10.08 20:14, Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Contrary to what the name suggest, lighttpd is not just a lightweight
>> web server, it is a powerful and complete implementation used by some of
>
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 23:17 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> Also note that whatever solution is chosen, this needs to be possible:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529852
Interesting. AFAIK lighttpd can use xattrs to set the MIME type, but not
sniff them.
> http://bugzilla.g
2008/10/24 Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 21:11 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
>> Isn't that what nfs does? Or for that matter, ftp? I don't understand
>> why a web server is needed for sharing files.
>
> WebDAV is supported natively with Bonjour/Zeroconf in MacOS X and
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 15:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> > A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide
> > Apache packages configured to run at startup, so it is not just a
> > matter of binary size.
> >
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 20:58 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> I don't think that this kind of FUD about Apache is very
> constructive. Just because lighttpd has a "light" in its name it
> doesn't mean that Apache is a slow huge beast. That is nonsense.
And just because Apache is famous
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 21:11 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> Isn't that what nfs does? Or for that matter, ftp? I don't understand
> why a web server is needed for sharing files.
WebDAV is supported natively with Bonjour/Zeroconf in MacOS X and
Windows, and is very well supported in GVFS and Nautil
Isn't that what nfs does? Or for that matter, ftp? I don't understand
why a web server is needed for sharing files.
2008/10/23, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Heya,
>
> I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
>
> Currently, gnome-user-share is a simple capplet and "da
On Fri, 24.10.08 20:14, Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 12:53 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> > As I said, it's clear to me that Apache does meet our goals here. If you
> > want to propose something else, the burden is on you to provide evidence
> > tha
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 12:53 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> As I said, it's clear to me that Apache does meet our goals here. If you
> want to propose something else, the burden is on you to provide evidence
> that what you propose is not only reasonably secure, but also have good
> proces
Em Qui, 2008-10-23 às 14:53 +0100, Bastien Nocera escreveu:
> Heya,
>
> I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
>
> But one of the main shorter term goals is to get the desktop sharing
> feature of vino integrated into gnome-user-share.
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Whoa? There is no Debian package simply because no one had stepped up so
> > far. Christophe Sauthier is starting to work on it, and I will help him
> > to get the necessary changes in postgresql.
>
> Thanks.
BTW, I talked to one
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 15:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I also think that Apache is a bad choice. If you need a good web server
> with DAV support, please think of lighttpd instead, or - much better -
> of a libsoup-based implementation.
There's also security issues to consider.
One good th
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 18:07 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 17:58 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> > SQLLite can't do what PostgreSQL can do, which is why PostgresSQL
> > exists. For instance:
> > - Multi-user and the relevant locking.
> > - Access control.
> > - Net
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 17:58 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> SQLLite can't do what PostgreSQL can do, which is why PostgresSQL
> exists. For instance:
> - Multi-user and the relevant locking.
> - Access control.
> - Network access.
As these are not things necessary for a UI generator, I t
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 15:11 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 18:22 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> > Yeah, I have the same problem with Glom's dependency on PostgreSQL.
> > Debian/Ubuntu users get an unused PostgreSQL instance even when Glom
> > isn't running, just beca
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 16:41 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > I doubt our server guys will get overly happy over the idea of
> > disabling a typical server daemon just so you can integrate it with
> > GNOME. I don't really think I want the server team to hate the GNOME
> > team any more.
>
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide
> Apache packages configured to run at startup, so it is not just a
> matter of binary size.
>
> What do distributors think?
I think we could split the web server
On Solaris, apache daemon is disabled by default aswell.
Matt
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008, à 14:38 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
Bastien already wrote about Fedora policy, httpd is disabled by
default. I know that Debian policy is to consider that the user
installing a
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 18:22 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> Yeah, I have the same problem with Glom's dependency on PostgreSQL.
> Debian/Ubuntu users get an unused PostgreSQL instance even when Glom
> isn't running, just because its Debian policy to run any services that
> are installed, wit
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008, à 14:38 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
>> Bastien already wrote about Fedora policy, httpd is disabled by
>> default. I know that Debian policy is to consider that the user
>> installing a server wants it to be started. From what I read of
>> P
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008, à 14:38 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> Bastien already wrote about Fedora policy, httpd is disabled by
> default. I know that Debian policy is to consider that the user
> installing a server wants it to be started. From what I read of
> Patryk, PLD Linux also star
Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier wrote:
> And what about Cherokee?
>
> http://www.cherokee-project.com
>
> It's small, modular, very light and easy to run as a user in specific
> port (to avoid bother system web servers, for example)
>
> http://www.cherokee-project.com/doc/bundle_cherokee-worker.html
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
>>> A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide
>>> Apache pack
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > > Not only is Apache quite a huge dependency to have, it is also very
> > > hard to package this into a generic distro where Apache comes
> > > preconfigured for heavy server use (and the same is true for most
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 11:26 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FWIW, this discussion happened about four years ago, see
>
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-November/msg00726.html
> (note: the thread continues into December 2004)
>
> It might be useful for people to rere
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:15 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> >> A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide
> >> Apache packages configured
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also there seem to be lighter alternatives:
> http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=658773
Also a Python GPL2 project:
http://pywebdav.sourceforge.net/
--
Patryk Zawadzki
___
des
Hi,
FWIW, this discussion happened about four years ago, see
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-November/msg00726.html
(note: the thread continues into December 2004)
It might be useful for people to reread the thread there.
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:15 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
>> A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide
>> Apache packages configured to run at startup, so it is not just a
>> matter of binary size.
Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> 2008-10-23 klockan 16:14 skrev Patryk Zawadzki:
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
>> Any plans on making it work without pushing Apache HTTPd onto
>> desktops? A
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> > > Not only is Apache quite a huge dependency to have, it is also very
> > > hard to package this into a generic distro where Apache comes
> > > preconfigured for heavy server use (and the same is true for most
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Not only is Apache quite a huge dependency to have, it is also very
> > hard to package this into a generic distro where Apache comes
> > preconfigured for heavy server use (and the same is true for most
> > "big" httpds).
>
> We're talking 3 megs of dependencies (and th
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 16:20 +0200, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> 2008-10-23 klockan 15:53 skrev Bastien Nocera:
> > I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
>
> Hi Bastien,
>
> Great to hear this.
>
> This is definitely a +1 from me. Not being able to easily transfer a file
>
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 16:14 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Any plans on making it work without pushing Apache HTTPd onto
> desktops? A small embedded HTTP server should be enough.
>
> Not only is Apache quite a huge dependency to have, it is also very
> hard to package this into a generic distro
2008-10-23 klockan 16:14 skrev Patryk Zawadzki:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
>
> Any plans on making it work without pushing Apache HTTPd onto
> desktops? A small embedded HTTP server
2008-10-23 klockan 15:53 skrev Bastien Nocera:
> I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
Hi Bastien,
Great to hear this.
This is definitely a +1 from me. Not being able to easily transfer a file
from my computer to e.g. a colleague's or friend's laptop without relying on
a
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heya,
>
> I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
>
> Currently, gnome-user-share is a simple capplet and "daemon" combination
> that, through obex-data-server and apache, provides users with simple
44 matches
Mail list logo
