Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-28 Thread Stéphan Kochen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lennart Poettering wrote: > This is more or less what I plan to do with "libcanberra" (which is > still vaporware right now, though). As described in huge email about > PA which I wrote on d-d-l: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-28 Thread Stéphan Kochen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Howard wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:57:10 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> Rodney was working on such a spec. But I'll give you £50 if you manage >> to create/gather up a sound theme of quality matching the current >> gnome-audio sounds, and tha

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-28 Thread Mark Howard
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:57:10 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Rodney was working on such a spec. But I'll give you £50 if you manage > to create/gather up a sound theme of quality matching the current > gnome-audio sounds, and that's actually shippable without copyright > problems by distributions.

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-26 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le lundi 26 novembre 2007 à 09:10 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > On Nov 25, 2007 6:54 PM, Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 22.11.07 18:18, Stéphan Kochen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > > That's because we never had a whole slew of potential replacements. The > >

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-26 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Nov 25, 2007 6:54 PM, Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 22.11.07 18:18, Stéphan Kochen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > That's because we never had a whole slew of potential replacements. The > > > current gnome-audio sounds suck (no offense to the original author), > > >

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 22.11.07 18:18, Stéphan Kochen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > That's because we never had a whole slew of potential replacements. The > > current gnome-audio sounds suck (no offense to the original author), > > they sound dated, and badly finished. Compare this to the MacOS (even > > prior

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-25 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 21.11.07 20:47, Stéphan Kochen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > 1) A replacement for the libgnome could be a GTK+ module, that simply > hooks signals and plays sounds. Sounds are preloaded by settings-daemon; > no difference from the current situation there. > > The GTK+ module can use PulseA

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-22 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Nov 21, 2007 2:47 PM, Stéphan Kochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With that out of the way, I'd be very happy to hear about any other > problems you are seeing (hearing), and comments on the solutions above. > (GTK+ modules are a specific area I'm not familiar with. If there's > anything spec

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 18:18 +0100, Stéphan Kochen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bastien Nocera wrote: > Using the gnome_sound_ or ESounD API really doesn't sound like a good > idea. The audio feedback features in general are not that urgent; the > impression I have

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-22 Thread Stéphan Kochen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bastien Nocera wrote: > See also: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368304 Thanks! That's a great pointer. :) > This needs application support, and widget support. I think you're going > overboard with your examples though. I think you shou

Re: System event sounds / audio feedback

2007-11-21 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 20:47 +0100, Stéphan Kochen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > > With the recent release of PulseAudio 0.9.7, and discussions surrounding > audio in GNOME, I thought I'd try and see if I could get some movement > in the system event so