Le lundi 10 avril 2006 à 17:00 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit :
> It has just come to my attention that one of the GNOME Goals is to port
> GNOME to using the po/LINGUAS file for 2.16, rather than having the
> LINGUAS listed directly in configure.{in,ac}.
>
> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PoLingua
Iain * wrote:
> On 4/10/06, Rodney Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> If we really want to do this, let's do it right and not with a hacky
>> workaround because people are afraid to depend on newer versions of
>> things for some reason.
>>
>
> gnome goal #3: port everything to a modern
Martin Wehner wrote:
>> I've noticed on the wiki, that several maintainers have
>> already committed the hackily annoying patches.
>>
>
> That includes me. Are there any potential build problems with the way
> described on the Wiki? Or is it just "unclean"?
>
It is yet another hack that wou
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Adam Schreiber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > Completely agreed. As someone who wrote one of the current
> > goals, I was a bit scared by how the goal went live with review
> > from only three people, and it could have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Completely agreed. As someone who wrote one of the current
> goals, I was a bit scared by how the goal went live with review
> from only three people, and it could have been flawed seriously.
> In this case (AppIcons) it proba
On 4/10/06, Rodney Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we really want to do this, let's do it right and not with a hacky
> workaround because people are afraid to depend on newer versions of
> things for some reason.
gnome goal #3: port everything to a modern version of automake!
__
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On another note, can we please discuss major changes such as this, on
> this list, before deciding on making them goals that people should be
> working on?
Completely agreed. As someone who wrote one of the current
goals, I was a bit scared by how the g
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 17:00 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On another note, can we please discuss major changes such as this, on
> this list, before deciding on making them goals that people should be
> working on?
I agree - The popt goal hit me totally out of the blue too.
> I've noticed on the w
It has just come to my attention that one of the GNOME Goals is to port
GNOME to using the po/LINGUAS file for 2.16, rather than having the
LINGUAS listed directly in configure.{in,ac}.
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PoLinguas is the link for the page
which describes the process for doing this.
