Re: Using C++ bindings for desktop/admin/devtools modules

2007-03-20 Thread Hubert Figuiere
Vincent Untz wrote: Does it make sense to allow the use of gtkmm and other C++ bindings in our desktop/admin/devtools suites? It does, definitely. Hub signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: Using C++ bindings for desktop/admin/devtools modules

2007-03-17 Thread Dodji Seketeli
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:53:58 -0500 Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We do actually already have C++ in the desktop with Epiphany, although that C++ code is limited to the Mozilla embedding, which you can't exactly get around. Ekiga is also written in C++, although not based on gtkmm.

Re: Using C++ bindings for desktop/admin/devtools modules

2007-03-17 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
On 3/16/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Right now, modules in desktop/admin/devtools suites can use the python bindings. We also accept the use of gtk# for proposed modules. However, it was never really agreed whether it was okay or not to use our C++ bindings for GNOME

Re: Using C++ bindings for desktop/admin/devtools modules

2007-03-17 Thread Elijah Newren
On 3/17/07, Jonathon Jongsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/16/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does it make sense to allow the use of gtkmm and other C++ bindings in our desktop/admin/devtools suites? As a frequent user of the gnome/gtk C++ bindings, I have to say that the C++

Re: Using C++ bindings for desktop/admin/devtools modules

2007-03-17 Thread Jonathon Jongsma
On 3/17/07, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/17/07, Jonathon Jongsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, right now there is a bit of a mindset in the free software world that if you're a C++ hacker, you belong in KDE, and if you're a C hacker, you belong in GNOME. I think a

Re: Using C++ bindings for desktop/admin/devtools modules

2007-03-17 Thread Dodji Seketeli
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:53:58 -0500 Shaun McCance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We do actually already have C++ in the desktop with Epiphany, although that C++ code is limited to the Mozilla embedding, which you can't exactly get around. Ekiga is also written in C++, although not based on gtkmm.

Using C++ bindings for desktop/admin/devtools modules

2007-03-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi all, Right now, modules in desktop/admin/devtools suites can use the python bindings. We also accept the use of gtk# for proposed modules. However, it was never really agreed whether it was okay or not to use our C++ bindings for GNOME modules. Those bindings have been rock-solid for quite

Re: Using C++ bindings for desktop/admin/devtools modules

2007-03-16 Thread Shaun McCance
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 20:43 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: Hi all, Right now, modules in desktop/admin/devtools suites can use the python bindings. We also accept the use of gtk# for proposed modules. However, it was never really agreed whether it was okay or not to use our C++ bindings for