https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770971
2016-08-14 11:08 GMT-03:00 Philip Withnall :
> Hey,
>
> On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 01:49 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> > >
> > > During the talk on GLib's new structured logging API at GUADEC
> > > today,
> > > it was pointed out
Hey,
On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 01:49 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> >
> > During the talk on GLib's new structured logging API at GUADEC
> > today,
> > it was pointed out that g_log_structured() (and the rest of the
> > interesting bits of the new structured logging API) are not
> > introspectable.
> >
Hi;
I actually like the idea of a GVariant based API, so +1 from me.
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
On Saturday, 13 August 2016, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hey,
>
> > During the talk on GLib's new structured logging API at GUADEC today,
> > it was pointed out that g_log_structured() (and the
Hi;
On Friday, 12 August 2016, Philip Withnall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> During the talk on GLib's new structured logging API at GUADEC today,
> it was pointed out that g_log_structured() (and the rest of the
> interesting bits of the new structured logging API) are not
>
Hey,
> During the talk on GLib's new structured logging API at GUADEC today,
> it was pointed out that g_log_structured() (and the rest of the
> interesting bits of the new structured logging API) are not
> introspectable.
>
> I'm not sure what we can do about this. The API is based around
>
Hi all,
During the talk on GLib's new structured logging API at GUADEC today,
it was pointed out that g_log_structured() (and the rest of the
interesting bits of the new structured logging API) are not
introspectable.
I'm not sure what we can do about this. The API is based around
GLogField,