On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:06 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
What's that noise? Oh, it's the collective teeth-gnashing from
OpenSolaris guys :)
I don't understand. Is there a problem that we can help with?
Not my department, but I gather that C++ ABI problems mean we'll
probably have to ship
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 16:37 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 17:06 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
What's that noise? Oh, it's the collective teeth-gnashing from
OpenSolaris guys :)
I don't understand. Is there a problem that we can help with?
Not my department, but I
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 16:18 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 19:32 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
Hi,
It was recently discussed whether to allow modules in
desktop/admin/develtools to have a dependency on gtkmm[1]. Several
people voiced support for the proposal
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 19:32 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
Hi,
It was recently discussed whether to allow modules in
desktop/admin/develtools to have a dependency on gtkmm[1]. Several
people voiced support for the proposal; not a single person objected.
This made our decision on the topic
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:32:30 -0600
Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This made our decision on the topic at the recent release-team meeting
very easy. :-) gtkmm is now allowed as a dependency.
What a nice easter present :-)
--
Dodji Seketeli
http://www.seketeli.org/dodji
Le lundi 09 avril 2007 à 19:32 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
Hi,
gtkmm is now allowed as a dependency.
Is it only gtkmm or also the bindings for gnomevfs, gconf, etc ?
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description
Le mardi 10 avril 2007, à 21:04, Benoît Dejean a écrit :
Le lundi 09 avril 2007 à 19:32 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
Hi,
gtkmm is now allowed as a dependency.
Is it only gtkmm or also the bindings for gnomevfs, gconf, etc ?
All the C++ bindings that are part of the bindings suite
