Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Maw, 2005-08-16 at 18:03 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > Seems that part of the code has been licensed under GPL instead of LGPL;
> > > IANAL, but doesn't this means that every project including recent-files
> > > code should be GPL'ed too? Anyway, isn't
On Maw, 2005-08-16 at 18:03 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Seems that part of the code has been licensed under GPL instead of LGPL;
> > IANAL, but doesn't this means that every project including recent-files
> > code should be GPL'ed too? Anyway, isn't the usual license for Gnome
> > code LGPL?
A
Hi Emmanuele,
Le mardi 16 août 2005 à 17:47 +0200, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
> Hi all.
>
> As seen in bugzilla:
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164192
>
> Seems that part of the code has been licensed under GPL instead of LGPL;
> IANAL, but doesn't this means that every project in
Hi all.
As seen in bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164192
Seems that part of the code has been licensed under GPL instead of LGPL;
IANAL, but doesn't this means that every project including recent-files
code should be GPL'ed too? Anyway, isn't the usual license for Gnome
cod
