On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 08:59 +0200, Juan Rafael García Blanco wrote:
> > I dare to propose myself for maintainer. I have almost no experience
> > in maintenance (I maintain libchamplainmm, which doesn't count);
>
> Looks like you already h
Hi all,
I added myself to the doap file. However, the commit was rejected while
pushing it to the repo because the file is not valid. Apparently it is
missing a 'description' property. Could I add one? I would copy the
description from the debian package:
"GNOME Dictionary can look for the defini
Hi,
I think gnome-dictionary 3.14.0 was released. It is tagged and a tarball
exists, both in git and ftp. So I think 3.14.1 can be released alone.
Regards,
Juan.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <
sriram.ramkris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Mich
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 08:36:41AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Do you want to make a 3.14.1
> release this weekend [2], to pick up the translation updates and the
> sidebar fix?
If no 3.14.0 version was released for gnome-dictionary, the version
should be 3.14.0, not 3.14.1 (but it can be re
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 22:33 +0200, Juan R. García Blanco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I do! If you agree, I'll wait until Sunday to make that release.
>
> Right now I do not have any questions. I have never uploaded a tarball
> to the ftp, though. I will for sure let you know if I any question
> comes
>
Hi,
Yes, I do! If you agree, I'll wait until Sunday to make that release.
Right now I do not have any questions. I have never uploaded a tarball
to the ftp, though. I will for sure let you know if I any question comes
to my mind.
Thank you!
Regards,
Juan.
On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 08:36 -0500, Mi
On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 08:59 +0200, Juan Rafael García Blanco wrote:
> I dare to propose myself for maintainer. I have almost no experience
> in maintenance (I maintain libchamplainmm, which doesn't count);
Looks like you already have a git account and know how to handle
releases, and have also dev
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 08:59:52AM +0200, Juan Rafael García Blanco wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I dare to propose myself for maintainer. I have almost no experience in
> maintenance (I maintain libchamplainmm, which doesn't count); I have some
> experience in development (gnome-spaceduel, and some patche
Hi all,
I dare to propose myself for maintainer. I have almost no experience in
maintenance (I maintain libchamplainmm, which doesn't count); I have some
experience in development (gnome-spaceduel, and some patches here and
there; gtkmm and clutter-gtkmm do not count either).
I assume you would m
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> I think we should have some integration at a platform level — i.e.
> "dictionary as a service" — that apps and the shell can use to show
> word definitions.
>
> I *definitely* don't think we should integrate this stuff in the shell
> as a de
hi;
On 6 October 2014 16:27, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
>> anybody looking for an *actual* dictionary. any and all replacements
>> are actually worse, and the only half-decent, maintained, and free (as
>> in beer) dictionary source we can use
On 10/06/2014 11:40 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 20:57 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
>> I do agree that Wiktionary is probably the best source we have.
>
> Wiktionary has a very limited API so you cannot easily use it as a
> translation dictionary, for example.
The android
On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 20:57 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> I do agree that Wiktionary is probably the best source we have.
Wiktionary has a very limited API so you cannot easily use it as a
translation dictionary, for example.
See http://en.wiktionary.org/w/api.php and
http://stackoverflow.com/
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> anybody looking for an *actual* dictionary. any and all replacements
> are actually worse, and the only half-decent, maintained, and free (as
> in beer) dictionary source we can use is Wiktionary, for which we
> could simply ship an epiphany
thanks Sindhu for letting us know, and especially for your hard work
on the Dictionary: it has been greatly appreciated, at least by me.
:-)
I'd like to mention that the Dictionary, at this point, should just be
dropped from any release suite, due to its obvious limitations.
while gnome-dictionar
Would someone like to take up releasing gnome-dictionary from here on?
I won't be able to make those releases.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
16 matches
Mail list logo
