Public bug reported:
E:Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks
** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to yelp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Public bug reported:
Basic information:
Description:Ubuntu 11.10
Release:11.10
eog:
Installed: 3.2.1-0ubuntu1
Candidate: 3.2.1-0ubuntu1
Version table:
*** 3.2.1-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates/main i386
Packages
100 /var/lib
Verified: The bugfix works fine with
LOdev 3.5.0beta2+ · Build ID: f47ee3c-7ef74e0-d7a1999
[libreoffice-3-5~2011-12-21_20.57.01_LibO-Dev_3.5.0beta2_Win_x86_install_en-US.msi
22-Dec-2011 ·
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Win-x86@6-fast/libreoffice-3-5/]
(on WinXP 32b · UI en-US)
... and y
this was introduced with the fix for bug 39159:
the view options are not restored for the pages shown in the print preview.
fixed on master:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=89d2733e16ae6233deea6bef3193bd45c89b854c
fixed on libreoffice-3-5:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/lib
*** Bug 44106 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857041
Title:
[Upstream] Nonprinting characters not showing in Writer
IMHO not resolved.
OS: Windows XP
LO: 3.5.0 beta2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857041
Title:
[Upstream] Nonprinting characters not showing in Writer
Status in
*** Bug 43468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857041
Title:
[Upstream] Nonprinting characters not showing in Writer
Good news! That is excellent!
Thanks for fixing that one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857041
Title:
[Upstream] Nonprinting characters not showing in Writer
St
*** Bug 44041 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857041
Title:
[Upstream] Nonprinting characters not showing in Writer
Since all new unconfirmed bugs start in state UNCONFIRMED now and old
unconfirmed bugs were moved to NEEDINFO with a explanatory comment, all
bugs promoted above those bug states to NEW and later are automatically
confirmed making the CONFIRMED whiteboard status redundant. Thus it will
be removed.
I just tested 3.5 beta 1.
LOdev 3.5.0, Build-ID: 7362ca8-b5a8e65-af86909-d471f98-61464c4
The non-printing characters still vanish after pdf export or print.
After pdf export the reappear after restart of LO or after pressing the
button. However, after print the bug is still there.
Go, go, go LOd
Now how it appears in slide show mode.
Notice the amount of extra and uneven white space between letters,
especially noticeable between the W and e of Webb and also the R and A
of PRA, but not right elsewhere either.
By the way, PDF export, subject of a similar bug in the past, works fine
for thi
Here's how a slide looks in design view, note the nice tight and even
appearance to the letter spacing.
** Attachment added: "Design view.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/908326/+attachment/2645431/+files/Design%20view.png
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Using LibreOffice Impress 3.4.4 under Ubuntu 11.10
When I design a slide in Impress the pair kerning appears correct. I
would expect the kerning to remain correct when the presentation is
shown.
What actually happens is that the kerning settings are not applied,
leading to
[Expired for metacity (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
[Expired for gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-setting
The proper solution here is to decouple the default text colors from the
GTK theme. As pointed out earlier, an LibO document should look the same
on any computer, provided the requisite fonts are installed.
Since this bug is getting ignored upstream, and since it's particularly
apparent on Ubuntu
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for vte (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: vte (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to vte in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for banshee (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: banshee (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to banshee in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for evolution (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
[Expired for rhythmbox (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]
** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
Could you post the output of "banshee --debug" please?
** Changed in: banshee (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to banshee in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905094
Title:
b
Notice most comments are about Natty however I experience the same
problem in Lynx especially if I select F-Spot pictures or just Pictures
as the screen saver. I've run Hypertorus for hours without a lock up.
When it locks I have to shut down to clear. Tried backing up two or
three kernels to no ef
On 24/12/2011 02:47, aarne kyppö wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> My Banshee-player doesnt play songs from beginning to end. It quit
> playing few seconds before it should. In one song unplayed part is 2
> seconds. in other song time is 3 seconds.
It's most likely a crash. Could you post the out
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659438 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659438
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 659438, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Also affects: unity-2d
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/9
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: metacity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90
I installed from the Firefox "Help" site.
When I typed "About" Firefox advised that a new version was available. I
downloaded the .tar.gz file, unpacked it but after extraction,the
original Ver 3 showed up. Only Peppermint upgraded to 9
Thanks
John
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 23:16 +, Daniel Man
Fresh install of Oneiric, no mobile indicators here. Is this actually
confirmed working or was it assumed because version X was supposed to
make it in?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
I experience this bug in version 0.13.3 of Rhythmbox on Ubuntu 11.04 .
I'm trying to listen to Democracy Now too ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78524
Title:
Podc
I get this problem with 0.13.3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244383
Title:
Rhythmbox frequently fails to compleatly download podcasts
Status in The Rhythmbox Music
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Could you detail the steps you followed to install Firefox 9?
You may have installed from a .tar.gz, the Firefox site makes 9.0.1
available in that format for Linux. However, .tar.gz packages are not
handled by Ub
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 807948 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807948
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #807948, so is being marked as such. Ple
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 876210 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876210
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/mozvoikko
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/ubufox
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906389
Title:
Tracking bug for F
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/firefox
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906389
Title:
Tracking bug for Firefox 9 (9.0.1) transition in Natty/Oneiric
Status
Public bug reported:
On governmen advice I attempted to upgrade my computers to Firefox
ver9... Peppermint OS upgraded, Ubuntu 10.10 still shows ver 3... and
MoonOS still shows ver 1 for Moon even though the two last OS said that
they had updated. Most confusing.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: U
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908277
Title:
which version Firefox
Status in “firefox” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
On governmen advice I attempted to
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/firefox
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/901838
Title:
Ugly busy cursor in Thunderbird 9
Status in The Mozilla Firefox Browse
Created attachment 53928
updated example of bad bracket behaviour
I made a new example document that shows more problems with the
brackets.
Right now there are two kinds of brackets. Normal and Scalable.
Normal Brackets just draw the Unicode character normally. It scales in
the same way all the
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/185600
Title:
[Upstream] LibreOffice repeatedly freezes after r
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/849508
Title:
[Upstream] Double clicking on .ods file opens Cal
** Changed in: df-libreoffice
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827695
Title:
[Upstream] bug in displaying scalable square brac
[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still p
[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still p
[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still p
Created attachment 53929
Image showing how bracket characters need to be mutated
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827695
Title:
[Upstream] bug in displaying scalable
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/firefox
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/maverick-proposed/firefox
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904594
Title:
Tracking bug for
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Changed in: mozvoikko (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Summary changed:
- Tracking bug for Firefox 9 transition in Natty/Oneiric
+ Tracking bug for Firefox 9 (9.0.1) transition in Natty/Oneiric
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
This bug was fixed in the package gnome-menus - 3.2.0.1-2ubuntu1
---
gnome-menus (3.2.0.1-2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low
[ Michael Terry ]
* Merge from Debian testing, remaining changes:
- debian/patches/09_app_install_entry.patch: Add Software Center
- debian/patches/seri
This bug was fixed in the package gnome-menus - 3.2.0.1-2ubuntu1
---
gnome-menus (3.2.0.1-2ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low
[ Michael Terry ]
* Merge from Debian testing, remaining changes:
- debian/patches/09_app_install_entry.patch: Add Software Center
- debian/patches/seri
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Please execute the following command, as it will automatically gather
debugging information, in a terminal:
apport-collect 908131
When reporting bugs in the future please use apport by using 'ubuntu-bug' and
the
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
After upgrading from 11.4 to 11.10 by way of Ubuntu update service
(internet), the Ubuntu "softwarenentrum" starts very slowly or not.
Ubuntu 11.4 worked better on Toshiba netbook NB250 with 2 GB working
memory (ram).
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubunt
Problem still exists in Precise. Is there a graphical workaround?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816669
Title:
encrypted-home support in new user dialog
Apologies for the delay in replying. Here's a more exact description of the
problem:
1) Try to use external monitor by plugging it in
2) Monitor gets enabled, but monitor layout is wrong
3) Open gnome-control center to the Displays section
4) Re-arrange monitors, hit "Apply"
5) Screens blink and f
Public bug reported:
10.04 Ubuntu using nautilus Network-Windows Network-workgroup
Used to show files on Ubuntu 10.04 server using Samba. Now I can only
reach the files by using:
Nautilus File-Connect to Server-Windows Share-servername.
I've kept up all updates and am not sure when this change
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908221
Title:
I cannot edite my data on my hard and the permissions are read only
Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug de
Public bug reported:
when i copy, cut, paste, edit, my data on my hard, an error message
appears, telling me that my drives, and removable media are red only.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: nautilus 1:3.2.1-0ubuntu3.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-15.24-generic 3.0.13
Public bug reported:
My Banshee-player doesnt play songs from beginning to end. It quit
playing few seconds before it should. In one song unplayed part is 2
seconds. in other song time is 3 seconds.
** Affects: banshee (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received thi
hi therei can't believe that i previously passed up it
opportunityhttp://www.kadirinyeri.com/profile/24SimonCook/";>http://www.kadirinyeri.com/profile/24SimonCook/see
you soon
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ub
Launchpad has imported 4 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34558.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help
Thanks David, although bug 86184 is the reverse issue (firefox is
supported and other windows not) it gave me the decisive idea. Open ccsm
workarounds-plugin, activate 'legacy_fullscreen_support', logout-in -
issue solved.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You
Stacktrace:
#0 0x05f26e07 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
Backtrace stopped: Not enough registers or memory available to unwind further
StacktraceTop: ?? ()
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "ThreadStacktrace.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908185/+attachment/2644973/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt
** Tags added: apport-failed-retrace
** Tags removed: need-i386-retrace
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, whic
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908185
Title:
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV
Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug descri
This seems related to Bug #86184. If you find this to be the same issue
we can mark this bug as a duplicate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819504
Title:
Firefox 6, 7,
More comment about post #28 above:
- unity 2d & 3d was completly purged, and their dependencies & related packages
too.
- but while booting i always got stuck to "checking battery state"
- looking at lightdm, it need EITHER lightdm-gtk-greeter (was installed) OR
unity-geeter. Thats wrong, unity
Any further attempts to open LO components failed.
Reboot has restored correct LO functionality.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907959
Title:
soffice.bin crashed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 838166 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838166
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #838166, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 838166 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838166
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #838166, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 838166 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838166
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #838166, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 838166 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838166
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #838166, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 838166 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838166
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #838166, so it is being marked as such. Please look a
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838166
Titl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 876754 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876754
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 874616
unity-greeter breaks .config/dconf/user file
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 876754
unity-greeter cripples the desktop theme when launche
Try run for 8c5b9300caf0 is complete.
Detailed breakdown of the results available here:
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=8c5b9300caf0
Results (out of 208 total builds):
exception: 1
success: 137
warnings: 56
failure: 14
Builds (or logs if builds failed) available at:
http:
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
