Just hit this bug on duplicity 0.8.23 on a modern FreeBSD PKG install.
Modern Debian apt package is 0.8.22 LOL. Now trying to get it installed
using python pip directly...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to duplicity in Ubunt
It seems to also track mouse movement when playing games in full-screen
mode which reduces FPS. Is this normal?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051383
Title:
gnome
Based on the data, I'm in the "No" camp as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051572
Title:
Always preseed core and snapd snap in server seed
Status in ubuntu-
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu's gnome-snapshot packaging had to diverge from Debian's because
current Rust policy for Ubuntu main requires that it be vendored. This
conflicts with best practice in Debian to devendor packages.
Ubuntu changes to GNOME packages are normally pushed to a separate
branch
Public bug reported:
ackage install-info 6.8-4build1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso
instalado paquete install-info script post-installation devolvió el
código de salida de error 1
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: install-info 6.8-4build1
Uname: Linux 6.7.4-2-liq
I'm marking this fixed since the upstream issue has been fixed in
Nautilus 46 Beta. The location in the headerbar can be directly edited
by simply clicking on it.
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will be released later this year with Nautilus 46.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Rel
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:51:46PM -, Philip Roche wrote:
> @vorlon @jchittum @paelzer given the above findings are you still -1 on
> any snap preseeding? Based on the data, I vote not to preseed any snaps.
That is my position. Thanks for bringing data to this!
--
You received this bug noti
With only snapd snap preseeded I get boot times very similar to
```
ubuntu@cloudimg:~$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 3.757s (kernel) + 12.458s (userspace) = 16.216s
graphical.target reached after 12.061s in userspace.
```
Which shows we are still taking a boot time hit of ~1.5 seconds...
h
** Tags added: noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037767
Title:
file-roller crashed with SIGSEGV in
egg_tree_multi_drag_button_release_event()
Status in file
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2037767 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037767
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #2037767, so is being marked as such.
> * boot times w/ and w/o preseeded snaps
Without preseeded snaps:
```
ubuntu@cloudimg:~$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 3.609s (kernel) + 11.026s (userspace) = 14.636s
graphical.target reached after 10.642s in userspace.
```
With preseeded snapd and core22 snaps:
```
ubuntu@cloudimg:~$ sy
Any news on this bug? Latest patches did not affect it
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049988
Title:
Latest kernel kills wifi.
Status in network-manager packa
Public bug reported:
I have Ubuntu 23.10 with mutter 45.2-0ubuntu3. I have an AZERTY
keyboard.
In order to switch to another application, I use Super+num (switch to
application number 'num' in my dock).
Since last update (Ubuntu 23.10), when the keyboard is captured by the current
window, I can
No, it does not need an epoch, but we do need to do another gobject-
introspection upload to stop building the binary packages that glib now
provides.
I have requested a review from another Debian maintainer:
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gobject-introspection/-/merge_requests/14
** Also af
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2052384 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052384
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #2052384, so is being marked as such.
It's marked failed to upload on all architectures right now:
INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0-dev_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the
archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1
INFOgir1.2-glib-2.0_1.78.1-15_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the
archive. 1.78.1-15 <= 2.79.1-1
I guess that me
** Changed in: nautilus
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054109
Title:
nautilus fails to build on armhf
Status in Nautilus:
New
Status
Public bug reported:
Hello,
I installed today Ubuntu Studio, Ubuntu Official and Ubuntu Unity - 24.04.
And i notice behaviour regarding plymouth and splash parameter.
When have splash parameter in cmdline, desktop remain with black screen
forever.
For workaround, i remove "splash" parameter fro
** Package changed: ubuntu => xorg (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054121
Title:
Random Freezing
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Ran
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
Random lockups in Ubuntu.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-17.17-generic 6.5.8
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-17-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
.proc.driver.nvidi
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
* LibreOffice 7.6.5 is in its fifth bugfix release of the 7.6 line:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.6#7.6.5_release
* Version 7.6.2 is currently released in mantic. For a list of fixed bugs
compared to 7.6.4 see the list of bugs fixed in th
Public bug reported:
Nautilus 46 fails to build on armhf because of a test failure. However,
the test failure might be revealing a bug in nautilus's functions that
would affect 32-bit architectures. I have filed the issue with the
Nautilus developers.
** Affects: nautilus
Importance: Unknown
** Changed in: devhelp (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: devhelp (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Georgia Garcia (georgiag)
** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
Assign
@vorlon
> Also, statically seeding a particular base snap is bad form, as soon
as lxd upgrades its base you lose your performance benefit and have to
play catch-up in a stable release.
yes I don't like this either. Even if we do change it later to core24
then the expectations people have for thei
** Changed in: ghostwriter (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to bubblewrap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046844
Title:
AppArmor user namespace creation rest
** Also affects: akonadiconsole (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: akonadiconsole (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: akonadiconsole (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: akonadiconsole (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubun
26 matches
Mail list logo
