I have a couple of questions with the test plan - as it stands, I don't see
where we're performing before/after tests of the xdg-desktop-portal package?
That is - where, in the test plan steps, do we actually install the package
from proposed? Do we need to
> delete ~/.local/share/flatpak/db/we
** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xdg-desktop-portal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077587
Title:
Refresh WebExtensi
Hello Xavier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apparmor into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello Nathan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-calendar into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
calendar/46.1-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
An upload of ubuntu-release-upgrader to noble-proposed has been rejected
from the upload queue for the following reason: "Changing the "The
package %s is marked for removal..." string to an f"" string
unnecessarily breaks translations, and it looks like the Amharic
translation got broken (it retain
Has the test plan (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/gjs)
been executed? It's great that GNOME Shell seems stable, but there are
other consumers of gjs that need testing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gjs in
Re-opening this bug as the SRU did not, in fact, fix it, but we don't
want to have to re-verify all the other fixes in this upload.
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
** Tags removed: fixed-in-mutter-46.2 fixed-upstream noble verification-
failed verificat
Re-opening this bug as the SRU did not, in fact, fix it, but we don't
want to have to re-verify all the other fixes in this upload.
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
** Tags removed: fixed-in-mutter-46.2 fixed-upstream verification-failed
verification-fai
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
Ok, this was introduced upstream somewhere between 2.36.0 (jammy
release) and 2.44.0 (jammy-updates). webkit2gtk now detects whether
gbm_bo_create_with_modifiers2 exists at build time; if so, it uses them.
This is not a problem for the main archive, as the libgbm that mesa
provides includes those
Yes, please make sure the flaky tests are marked as such in the
autopkgtests. SRUs are not released until either the test passes or the
package version is marked as badtest in the britney hints.
(A retry has caused it to pass on armhf)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Public bug reported:
So, this is pretty weird.
In the Shell quick settings panel (the one accessed by clicking on the
wifi/bluetooth/sound/battery part of the top bar), in the Shutdown
submenu, the "Suspend" button - and *only* the Suspend button - does not
respond to mouse clicks. I cannot use i
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-0ubuntu2~really45.0 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
Ah, jbicha had already retriggered the autopkgtests, and they now pass.
Huzzah!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064
Title:
Clicking a hyperlink in a PDF fails to ope
Retriggered the autopkgtest to use the correct apparmor version; let's
see if that fixes things.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794064
Title:
Clicking a hyperlink in a
OOoooh, right. This is releasable, and has a sensible changelog, it's
just that LP isn't showing the full changes file.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-drivers-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19903
It seems that it's already been retried once in the main archive. I note
that your PPA builds *without* -proposed enabled, whereas the archive
will build *with* -proposed enabled - possibly this is why it fails in
the archive and succeeds in your PPA?
--
You received this bug notification because
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glib2.0 into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.76.4-0ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
gdm3 looks good to me, but I haven't accepted it yet as it depends on
the gnome-settings-daemon patches and I think it's best to resolve those
questions before accepting gdm3 into -proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
> Smartcard authentication using custom methods using via a custom
configured system nss database may not work anymore.
Do I read the gnome-settings-daemon patches correctly, and this actually
just entirely drops support for auth via NSS? So the regression
potential is that if someone has set up a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for xserver-xorg-video-
amdgpu has completed successfully and the package is now being released
to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is
being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report.
In the event th
Ooof, double oops. That's the *flatpak* version they've described, not
the appstream-glib version they've tested.
Nathan Teodosio: could you (or someone else) double-check that this is
fixed specifically by appstream-glib 0.7.16-1ubuntu2 in Focal?
--
You received this bug notification because yo
Oops! Looks like the last commenter meant to set this into the
verification-done state, rather than -failed, as they've got correct
output.
Fixing and releasing.
** Tags removed: verification-failed-focal verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done-focal
** Tags removed: verification-do
Hello Kai-Chuan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-
amdgpu/22.0.0-1ubuntu0.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us b
An upload of xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu to jammy-proposed has been
rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "This looks
good, but you've included two slightly different versions of the patch?
Please re-upload with just one :)".
--
You received this bug notification because you are
The verification of the Stable Release Update for yaru-theme has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounte
The verification of the Stable Release Update for yaru-theme has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounte
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubuntu-meta has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.9.2~20.04.2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.9.2~22.04.2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected,
Accepted adsys into kinetic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/0.9.2ubuntu0.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wik
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Now an ubuntu-release thread: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
release/2023-June/005650.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2020682
Title:
Release adsys 0.12.0
I see that we've done this sort of wholesale backport once before, but
this doesn't seem like it falls under the "other safe cases" part of the
SRU criteria:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Other_safe_cases
It seems like this should have a more formal process? I don't see any
special
Hello Angel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
shell/44.1-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
htt
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
shell/44.1-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
While the discussion about the test plan is ongoing
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/scope-of-gnome-mru/18041/58 I'm happy to
accept this with the currently documented test plan and the test plans
on all the associated bugs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Hello Nathan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/44.1-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/44.1-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/44.1-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.
Hello Tim, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/44.1-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubu
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/44.1-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/44.1-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.
An upload of ayatana-indicator-messages to lunar-proposed has been
rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "Rejecting from
the queue as this is still missing SRU information, and that should
notify someone who cares :). The diff itself looks fine, although the it
now also needs fix
** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/+bug/2015955/+attachment/5663166/+files/CoreDump.gz
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
It looks like (for Jammy, at least) there is an in-archive consumer of
libwpebackend-fdo-1.0-1 - cog. We need at least a minimal smoke test for
SRU verification, and that should suffice. I don't have a Jammy system
handy, and cog isn't in the archives post-Jammy - could someone please
cook up a min
Aha! This *is* an artefact of something strange on my system; namely, I
was starting gnome-control-center from a terminal emulator packaged as a
snap; as such, it has a LD_LIBRARY_PATH specified, which was partially
overriding library resolution.
Weird that this manifests as the application cleanl
Public bug reported:
Attempting to scroll with the scroll wheel beyond the bounds of the
content (so, scrolling up when at the top or scrolling down when at the
bottom of a list) causes gnome-control-center to exit cleanly (not
crash) with exit code 1.
There do not appear to be any interesting me
Hello Robert, or anyone else affected,
Accepted glib2.0 into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.72.4-0ubuntu2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Hello Mustafa, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xorg-server into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-
server/2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.7 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
The verification of the Stable Release Update for vte2.91 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Can anyone do the verification for kinetic? Releasing this for 22.04 is
blocked waiting on successful testing for 22.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libcanberra in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983794
Title
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pango1.0 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libreoffice has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libmbim has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Mustafa, or anyone else affected,
Accepted metacity into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/1:3.44.0-1ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Mustafa, or anyone else affected,
Accepted metacity into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/1:3.36.1-1ubuntu1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Hello Rico, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libreoffice into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:7.3.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for xorg-server has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
Looks like the DEP8 test is flaky; it has failed with previous non-xorg-
server packages as well, and I've just retried it and it has passed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Is there a way to make the the shortcut change only apply on layouts
where this is a problem? I think this is close enough to deliberately
introducing a regression (“my keyboard shortcut doesn't work anymore”)
that it's inappropriate for an SRU as-is.
--
You received this bug notification because
Mostly looks ok, but ubuntu-0001-tdf-150682-Change-shortcut-of-
inserting-Math-objects.patch doesn't seem like an appropriate change for
an SRU.
By my understanding this will change the shortcut for "insert math
object" on everyone's system. Is my understanding correct? If so, I
think this behavio
I'm not sure Argyll is going to be MIR-able; could we instead demote
colord-sensor-argyll to universe?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to colord in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2003833
Title:
colord migration bl
Hello Bram, or anyone else affected,
Accepted fonts-noto-color-emoji into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-noto-color-
emoji/2.038-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libnl3 has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xorg-server into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-
server/2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted xorg-server into kinetic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-
server/2:21.1.4-2ubuntu1.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this n
Hello Gunnar, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-control-center into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-
center/1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testi
llvm-toolchain-15 will presumably need to be promoted to main in jammy-
proposed/-updates, yes? I'm not familiar with the process of backporting
NEW packages into main; presumably because it's in main in lunar that'll
be ok, but I'd like to check with the MIR team that my assumption is
correct.
--
Right, but as far as the archive is concerned, libdrm-tegra0 itself is
unused :)
What code *does* use libdrm-tegra0, and how sure are we that it doesn't
use those symbols (even accidentally)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed
spirv-headers is build-depended on by several packages; could we do
test-rebuilds of those as a part of verification, please.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991761
Title:
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted spirv-headers into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spirv-
headers/1.6.1+1.3.216.0-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in
the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing thi
I know it doesn't have any rdepends in the archive, but this includes a
libdrm-tegra0 ABI break without bumping SONAME; what sort of consumers
of libdrm-tegra0 are likely to exist? What risk mitigations could we
implement?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted directx-headers into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-
headers/1.606.4-1~ubuntu0.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/22.0.5-0ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello Kai-Chuan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/22.0.5-0ubuntu0.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libqmi into kinetic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libqmi/1.32.0-1ubuntu0.22.10.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
These seem reasonable, particularly if there's later HWE updates to be
made. I assume the Cert lab has some of the hardware to test on?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libmbim in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libmbim into kinetic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmbim/1.28.0-1~ubuntu22.10.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
Hello Sebastien, or anyone else affected,
Accepted modemmanager into kinetic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/1.20.0-1~ubuntu22.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new p
Is there a particular reason why we should take the PCI-ID removals?
They seem safe enough, though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998893
Title:
NV reverse prime HDMI ha
An upload of mesa to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "Looks like there's unintentional
changes in src/mesa/formats.csv".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
http
An upload of mesa to jammy-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "Looks like there's unintentional
changes in src/mesa/formats.csv".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
http
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-shell has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
1 - 100 of 913 matches
Mail list logo
