[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2076543] Re: do solve this

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2077658] Re: Does not detect hotplugged storage device

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2050831] Re: Performance

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2039993] Re: package libsane-common 1.2.1ppa3-jammy0 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/man/man5/sane-umax_pp.5.gz », qui appartient aussi au

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2040100] Re: package libreoffice-common 4:7.5.7-0ubuntu0.23.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed libreoffice-common package post-installation script subprocess returned er

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2035221] Re: driver problem

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2033181] Re: package libreoffice-common 1:6.0.7-0ubuntu0.18.04.13 failed to install/upgrade: conflicting packages - not installing libreoffice-common

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2023688] Re: error

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2024396] Re: Xorg crash

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2018437] Re: package firefox (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new firefox package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2012184] Re: Black screen after logout and login in wayland session.

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2007217] Re: error from xdiagnose application

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1996494] Re: CVE-2022-2309: NULL Pointer Dereference allows attackers to cause a denial of service (or application crash)

** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19964

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1995402] Re: cups keeps spool files forever and thus reveals confidential data

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security ** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995402 Ti

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1990886] Re: Security updates missing after 91.11.0

Hi Olivier, Do you have any updates on line for thunderbird? We got a similar question last week on IRC. ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security ** Changed in: thunderbird (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1984041] Re: 界面卡死

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it shows evid

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1986832] Re: lag in animations and some other bugs

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1982898] Re: CVE-2021-46829: Buffer overwrite in io-gif-animation.c composite_frame() in gdk-pixbuf

Hi Joshua and Pedro, Have you reported the side effects of the fix to those projects you mentioned? If yes could you add the bug reports here? thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gdk-pixbuf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1980873] Re: New release 103.0.5060.53 for Bionic

** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980873 Title: New release 103.0.5060.53 for Bionic S

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1925705] Re: 100% cpu

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1925409] Re: the screen just blink. somewhat look crash

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1925188] Re: Mozilla Firefox Multiple Vulnerabilities

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19251

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1923675] Re: package chromium-browser 1:85.0.4183.83-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso nuevo paquete chromium-browser script pre-installation devolvió el código

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it shows evid

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1924184] Re: drive not showing

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1901119] Re: nvidia-340

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1895839] Re: CVE-2020-24977

** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895839 Title: CVE-2020-24977 Status in libxml2 package in Ubuntu: Co

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900673] Re: package texlive-plain-generic 2019.202000218-1 failed to install/upgrade: el paquete está en un estado muy malo e inconsistente - debe reinstalarlo antes de inten

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it shows evid

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1899393] Re: package im-config 0.29-1ubuntu12.4 failed to install/upgrade: package im-config is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status 'half-installed')

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1900134] Re: package ubuntu-minimal 1.450.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1893005] Re: the function of "ask for this password every time" is diable

Did you set "all users may connect to this network" option in network manager? Or do you have any other option set? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager-applet in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893005

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1893005] Re: the function of "ask for this password every time" is diable

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1893116] Re: IntelliJ Idea doesn't work properly. It's based on Ubuntu20.04

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892985] Re: package libegl-mesa0 20.0.8-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 [modified: usr/share/glvnd/egl_vendor.d/50_mesa.json] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/shar

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892841] Re: package libsane 1.0.29-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: unable to stat './usr/share/doc/libsane' (which I was about to install): Input/output error

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1892727] Re: package chromium-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: 新的 chromium-browser 软件包 pre-installation 脚本 子进程返回错误状态 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

Hi @ahasenack, @seb128 I saw you've both have dealt with smb issues. Could you please take a look on this issue? Thanks! ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1885393] Re: Dark theme

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it shows evid

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1875000] Re: [HP Pavilion dv2500 Notebook PC, Conexant CX20549 (Venice), Speaker, Internal] fails after a while. The speaker in laptop turns on and off automatically during boo

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1875261] Re: package libnvidia-gl-430 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new libnvidia-gl-430:i386 package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile