[Desktop-packages] [Bug 969489] Re: lightdm tries (and fails) to start too early?

2013-01-09 Thread Ivo Anjo
Bug 1080082 has been marked as a duplicate of this one, although I'm not sure it is (I use fglrx). Anyway, my workaround for 1.5 months with no issues and no need for arbitrary sleep has been to modify /etc/init/lightdm.conf and adding "respawn" like this: ... stop on runlevel [016] respawn # <-

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1080082] [NEW] Lightdm killed during boot (kills itself?)

2012-11-17 Thread Ivo Anjo
Public bug reported: I'm running 12.10, and since installing the stable release in October I didn't install any upgrades. This week, after installing the latest upgrades, lightdm stopped working: the Xserver starts, and dies immediately, leaving me on a tty7 with remains of log messages. If I log

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1080082] Re: Lightdm killed during boot (kills itself?)

2012-11-25 Thread Ivo Anjo
Might be related to bug #838586 and question #208880 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080082 Title: Lightdm killed during boot (kills itself?) Status in Ligh

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1080082] Re: Lightdm killed during boot (kills itself?)

2012-11-28 Thread Ivo Anjo
Just to add, I've tried multiple workarounds, and the best one (works every time) and less intrusive is modifying the file /etc/init/lightdm.conf adding "respawn" like this: ... stop on runlevel [016] respawn emits login-session-start emits desktop-session-start emits desktop-shutdown --- --

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 605567] Re: Extremely slow painting of launchpad.net bug details page with nvidia driver

2012-06-26 Thread Ivo Anjo
@Robert: This is a firefox+nvidia proprietary linux driver issue. Other browsers and drivers do not have it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605567 Title: Extremely slo

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 969489] Re: lightdm tries (and fails) to start too early?

2013-07-17 Thread Ivo Anjo
@Clint: But honestly, why not deploy the workaround by default? It has 0 bad effects when you don't have the issue, and is the difference between some strange flickering and most people not being able to get a working system at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 969489] Re: lightdm tries (and fails) to start too early?

2013-07-22 Thread Ivo Anjo
> I have not seen data that proves it has 0 bad effects. I'd suspect that > it would have a minor impact on time between power-on and login for > those users who are not affected, but I also have no data on that either. Sorry... say what!? I will just quote it for you, from canonical's upstart do

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 969489] Re: lightdm tries (and fails) to start too early?

2013-07-22 Thread Ivo Anjo
Is this both a lightdm bug and a failsafe-x bug? Because I don't get failsafe-x when lightdm fails, I just get a tty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969489 Title: ligh

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 969489] Re: lightdm tries (and fails) to start too early?

2013-08-16 Thread Ivo Anjo
I had this with fglrx, so either both amd and nvidia suffer from the same bug, or it is elsewhere. It's just a pity that this is treated as such low priority. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1217636] [NEW] Tomboy causing logout delay again

2013-08-27 Thread Ivo Anjo
Public bug reported: My logout has been slow for months. Finally I decided to look it up, and it seemed that tomboy could cause this, but the bug should be fixed according to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomboy/+bug/880299 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomboy/+changelog But

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 969489] Re: lightdm tries (and fails) to start too early?

2013-02-26 Thread Ivo Anjo
Interesting, I too use btrfs for root and home. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969489 Title: lightdm tries (and fails) to start too early? Status in Upstart: New St

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1097763]

2013-03-30 Thread Ivo Anjo
As peke said in comment #30: It's fixed in Firefox 19 (thanks!) but it can still happen when using hardware acceleration. I turned on layers.acceleration.force-enabled today (Firefox 20 / Ubuntu 12.10 64-bit / nvidia 310.14) and started noticing the issue again. I can see it clearly in gmail, and

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1097763]

2013-03-30 Thread Ivo Anjo
Ah, my bad! No need to screencast, the issue is exactly what kokoko3k said in comment #28, but it doesn't need to be on a native widget (I see it on gmail). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1097763]

2013-03-30 Thread Ivo Anjo
@Comment #33: I'm not sure, I just tried to reproduce your issue and couldn't. Have you tried it on another machine, just to be sure? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10977

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 605567] Re: Extremely slow painting of launchpad.net bug details page with nvidia driver

2012-03-20 Thread Ivo Anjo
I think this bug should be attacked in two ways: 1) try to work with firefox and nvidia to fix this and 2) fix launchpad. The bug is elsewhere, but launchpad being broken with the default ubuntu browser with pretty much the default configuration of any nvidia linux user is very bad usability. And

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 855793] Re: Kubuntu 11.10 beta 1: Error upgrading using muon

2012-01-08 Thread Ivo Anjo
Kpackagekit also breaks with updates (see my previous comment, its latest version is called Apper) so... yeah. Not the solution also. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gtk+2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/85579

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 855793] Re: Kubuntu 11.10 beta 1: Error upgrading using muon

2012-01-04 Thread Ivo Anjo
I also saw this. It's a pity that both Apper (Bug# 905415) and Muon are broken for system upgrades. Shouldn't this be attributed to qapt or something like that? It seems that packages do upgrade fine with apt-get, aptitude, synaptic, etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 471457] Re: Shutdown does not have priority over suspend/hibernation

2014-04-17 Thread Ivo Anjo
As an update, I never saw this issue again, so indeed it seems it is caused by a race in logind. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471457 Title: Shutdown does

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 471457] Re: Shutdown does not have priority over suspend/hibernation

2014-01-26 Thread Ivo Anjo
Just made a clean install of Ubuntu saucy and this started happening to me sometimes. I believe the issue happens due to systemd-logind, which is set to always standby a laptop when you close the lid, and the supposed solution can be found here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/360615 /ubuntu-server

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 471457] Re: Shutdown does not have priority over suspend/hibernation

2014-04-23 Thread Ivo Anjo
Reported as a logind issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1311648 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471457 Title: Shutdown does not h

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 981473] Re: HP Officejet Pro K550 fails to print in Ubuntu

2014-04-23 Thread Ivo Anjo
Ok so recently I got surprised by this issue. Unfortunately it is not fixed in 13.10 and I don't believe it will be in 14.04 either. The "changing driver" workaround did work for me. The strange thing was, I installed the latest HP drivers on windows xp and I got the exact same behavior! And also

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1311697] [NEW] HP Officejet Pro K550 should use hpijs by default

2014-04-23 Thread Ivo Anjo
Public bug reported: When an HP Officejet Pro K550 is connected, by default CUPS picks hpcups as a driver. Unfortunately, hpcups is broken for this printer, and it has been for a long time. https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/981473 It was first broken in 11.04 and has been broken since. It h

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1311697] Re: HP Officejet Pro K550 should use hpijs by default

2014-04-29 Thread Ivo Anjo
Can this please be backported to at least Ubuntu 14.04? Otherwise users will be afected by this issue for years to come. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to hplip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311697 Title: HP

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1311697] Re: HP Officejet Pro K550 should use hpijs by default

2014-05-02 Thread Ivo Anjo
Thanks, I'll test as soon as it is posted! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to hplip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311697 Title: HP Officejet Pro K550 should use hpijs by default Status in “hplip” package

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1311697] Re: HP Officejet Pro K550 should use hpijs by default

2014-05-14 Thread Ivo Anjo
I successfully tested hplip/3.14.3-0ubuntu3.2 and it fixes my issue. Thanks a lot! --- To test: I removed all printers from my system, and then added the printer again (with the system-config-printer menu) with the old version, and hpcups was selected. I then removed the printer again, upgraded

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1311697] Re: HP Officejet Pro K550 should use hpijs by default

2014-05-14 Thread Ivo Anjo
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to hplip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1311697 Title: HP Officejet Pro K550 should use hpijs by default St

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 531208]

2015-01-03 Thread Ivo Anjo
+1 thank you Ruslan. I'm guessing that at this point we should be asking for this to be implemented on Wayland, as it seems that X will be deprecated soon enough and its input code is complex and strange enough (no screensaver when a pop-up menu is open, for instance) that this won't make it. --

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1475633] Re: New upstream version 2.4 / please merge with Debian 8's wpa 2.3

2015-11-02 Thread Ivo Anjo
Thanks for the answer. Upstream has since released wpa 2.5 which includes those patches so I'll open a new request asking for that version instead of the backport. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu. https://bug

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1512520] [NEW] New upstream release wpa 2.5

2015-11-02 Thread Ivo Anjo
Public bug reported: Upstream release 2.5 has come out recently, including a number of security bugfixes and additional channel selection and performance improvements to 5GHz networks. Please update to it :) Changelog: 2015-09-27 - v2.5 * fixed P2P validation of SSID element length befor

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1475633] Re: New upstream version 2.4 / please merge with Debian 8's wpa 2.3

2015-09-21 Thread Ivo Anjo
The current wpa version in debian testing includes the 5GHz band selection improvements patch backports: https://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wpa/news/20150906T154058Z.html Would it be possible to also include these patches? As far as I've checked, they were not included in the ubuntu 2.4 version. (

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1475633] Re: New upstream version 2.4 / please merge with Debian 8's wpa 2.3

2015-07-21 Thread Ivo Anjo
It would be awesome to watch closely for the new version including the 5GHz improvements: http://blog.sesse.net/blog/tech/2015-07-14-21-25_wpa_supplicant_5ghz_improvements.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubunt