Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
Marking Oneiric as Fix Released. Not only do I not see this, but the
patch in the upstream bug is including in Oneiric's rhythmbox.
** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Pac
hould consider confining (at least) those filters that we ship in
Ubuntu.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: cups (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Affects: e
** Summary changed:
- use of Ux in ubuntu-* abstractions and profiles is too lenient
+ use of Ux in ubuntu-* abstractions and profiles is too lenient and should be
improved
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubunt
pitti, before you spend too much time on fixing anything (by all means,
investigate its impact), let me get a fix for evince going-- I'm working
on a 'sanitizing child profile' approach that we can reuse or adapt for
cups.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Let me clraify: I'm working on a 'sanitizing child profile' approach
that we *could maybe* reuse or adapt for cups.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851986
Title:
use of
Martin, actually it may not be such a large task (you should wait and
see the sanitizing child profile approach I am using) and while not a
regression (I don't think it was tagged as such?), it may be a
worthwhile enhancement.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desk
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-2 => ubuntu-11.10
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-2 => ubuntu-11.10
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Milestone: ubuntu-11.10-beta-2 => ubuntu-11.10
--
You received this b
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851385
Title:
package libreoffice-com
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846108
Title:
I am unable to download an
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/855537
Title:
package gdm 3.0.4-0ubuntu10 fai
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848786
Title:
Oneiric not asking for password switching between logged in users
Status in “
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848456
Title:
Switch User Account does not require password entry
Status in “lightdm” package in Ubunt
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851284
Title:
package firefox 6.0.2+build
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846839
Title:
Depois que instalei a nova
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/852657
Title:
Software Security Device doesn't block copy/past passwords
Status in “firefox” package i
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856401
Title:
https://www.zipvitsport.co.uk/ shows untrusted site certificate
Status in “firefox” pack
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/857512
Title:
software-center cra
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to empathy in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/855140
Title:
empathy-chat crashed with S
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850113
Title:
gnome-panel crashed wit
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to software-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848288
Title:
software centre pro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 844274 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844274
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 844274, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. This bug was reported
against a release of Ubuntu which has reached EOL (End of Life) and
is therefore no longer supported. As a result, this bug is being marked
"Won't Fix". Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases for currently
supported Ubuntu relea
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856401
Title:
https://www.zipvitsport.co.uk/ shows untrusted site certif
Thank you for using Ubuntu and reporting a bug. While this might be
considered a bug, it is not crossing privilege boundaries and is
therefore not a security issue. The password is not displayed
inappropriately, and with having physical access to perform a copy/paste
you have access to show the pas
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in
English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu
developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it
shows evid
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Your bug report is more likely to get attention if it is made in
English, since this is the language understood by the majority of Ubuntu
developers. Additionally, please only mark a bug as "security" if it
shows evid
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to jockey in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887070
Title:
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888721
Title:
Locked screen is visible for about a second on user switch
Status in “gnome-sc
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
FYI: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
desktop/2011-November/003474.html
Basically, this email states desktopcouch is unsupportable and I
strongly encourage the desktop team to unseed it for 12.04 LTS.
Also, on a side note, if evolution-desktopcouch is the only thing
keeping it in main, t
** Also affects: couchdb (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: couchdb-glib (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: desktopcouch (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: evolution-c
The workaround for this is to add to /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.bin.evince:
/usr/bin/nautilus Ux,
Then run:
$ sudo apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.evince
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu Security Team (ubuntu-security) => Jamie Strandboge
(jdstrand)
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Tags added: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, wh
There are two issues being reported here:
1. the access to /run/udev/data: this is bug #883045
2. the @{HOME} rw access
The profile mentions why this is needed:
# This is need for saving files in your home directory without an extension.
# Changing this to '@{HOME}/** r' makes it require an ex
"Why is it that difficult to understand that I do not ask you to make
ubuntu more tight, but to split the configuration into two parts to
allow users to make it more tight if they want without breaking the
package updates?"
Ok, so this is a 3rd separate bug report in addition to the other two:
not
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Low
Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
Status: Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desk
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your
report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can
better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it.
Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For
help see https://wiki.ubuntu.
system-tools-backends is no longer in main and has been deprecated. I am
going to leave this bug open for now, but unsubscribing ubuntu-security.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in Ubuntu.
https://bug
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227808
Title:
fi
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Micah Gersten (micahg)
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu Maverick)
Assignee: (unassign
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881103
Title:
after screen lock, you can log on wit
Confirmed this also affects 12.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894263
Title:
No log on information through lightdm-gtk-greeter..
Status in “lightdm” package in Ubu
I can confirm this. If I ssh into a VM and run 'w', I see my ssh session:
$ w
11:14:24 up 1 min, 1 user, load average: 0.34, 0.14, 0.05
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
jamiepts/0luna.local 11:140.00s 0.33s 0.00s w
If I then log into the V
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
** Visibility changed to: Public
** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
I don't think this should be allowed by default, but do think it could
be part of a googletalk profile or flash profile. User's who require
this for now should add the access to
/etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.bin.firefox. A future update may provide an
easier method to enable this, or even a commented o
** Package changed: apparmor (Ubuntu) => evince (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Based on ibidem's comments, I am going to mark this as "Won't Fix" for
now.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Micah Gersten (micahg) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Won't F
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/826060
Title:
evince crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
New
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross privile
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904140
Title:
evince crashed with SIGSEGV in child_setup()
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906971
Title:
evince crashed with SIGSEGV in __strchr_sse2()
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903530
Title:
Chinese word cannot display correctly.
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug descript
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/908729
Title:
Anomalies when displaying a PDF document
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug descri
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 864992 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864992
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 864992, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87692
ete
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888789
Title:
evince doesn't rend
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848833
Title:
Multitouch support in evince is half-baked
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bu
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884406
Title:
hitting ctrl-home doesn't change the position in bookmarks
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
Looking at the apparmor denials, you have non-standard paths and will need to
update the profile to allow access. You can add the following to
/etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.bin.evince:
/srv/system/usr/local/** r,
/local/stores/morse/** r,
Then perform:
$ sudo apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/u
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/872075
Title:
possible evince memory leak, system unresponsive with high iowait
Status in “evince” package in
quot;exec" parent=15296
profile="/usr/bin/evince" name="/usr/local/texlive/bin/i386-linux/mktexpk"
pid=15304 comm="evince" requested_mask="x" denied_mask="x" fsuid=1000 ouid=1000
It seems you are using a non-standard texlive. If so, you can upda
quot;exec" parent=15296
profile="/usr/bin/evince" name="/usr/local/texlive/bin/i386-linux/mktexpk"
pid=15304 comm="evince" requested_mask="x" denied_mask="x" fsuid=1000 ouid=1000
It seems you are using a non-standard texlive. If so, you can upd
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/891440
Title:
evince crashed with SIGSEGV in xcb_get_extension_data()
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885020
Title:
evince crashed with SIGSEGV
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug description:
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882727
Title:
evince assert failure: *** glibc detected *** evince: malloc():
smallbin double linked list cor
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882038
Title:
evince crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug d
** Package changed: firefox (Ubuntu) => apparmor (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562831
Did you reload the profile with 'sudo apparmor_parser -r
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.evince'? If so, can you attach you dmesg output?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846646
Ti
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
Added an evolution task as it isn't clear if it is evolution or nss that
is the problem.
** Also affects: evolution (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu Precise)
Milesto
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911592
Title:
[precise] Too few certificate authorities lis
Thanks Daniel, I think we can rule apparmor out as the problem then.
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) => (unassigned)
** Tags removed: apparmor
--
You received this bug notifi
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => precise-alpha-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None => precise-alpha-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => precise-alpha-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
This should actually be fixed in the apparmor ubuntu-media-players
abstraction.
** Package changed: evince (Ubuntu) => apparmor (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/89
Uploaded 3.2.1-0ubuntu2.1 to oneiric-proposed. Waiting on approval.
** Description changed:
- Very nice new feature, but it didn't work. I clicked "Show Containing
- Folder" and a red error message came up at the top of the window and
- said "Failed to execute Child process "Nautilus" (Permissio
This was fixed long ago when we updated apparmor for multiarch paths.
** Package changed: evince (Ubuntu) => apparmor (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscri
Thanks for the fix Mathieu. I can confirm the evolution is working
properly again.
Is the change something we need to fix in other places (or centrally in
nss) or was it just evolution getting it wrong?
** Changed in: nss (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received t
In openssl the only gif is their logo in their documentation which is
not displayed anywhere prominently in Ubuntu. We are not going to
diverge from upstream on this.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Let's mark this as 'Invalid' in nss for now. If needed, we can reopen.
Thanks again Mathieu.
** Changed in: nss (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
** Changed in: nss (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: precise-alpha-2 => None
--
You received this bug notification because you are
701 - 800 of 1224 matches
Mail list logo
