[Desktop-packages] [Bug 766882] Re: [apparmor] evince need access to /dev/.udev/data/b

2012-04-04 Thread MFeif
I'm still having this bug, and it does seem like it's hard-crashing my system. I want to get my stability back, but I can't uninstall evince since gnome-core and about 50 other pacakges seem to depend on it. I'm on Oneiric 64, I have evince 3.2.1-0ubuntu2.2 and apparmor 2.7.0~beta1+bzr1774-1ubunt

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2012-01-15 Thread MFeif
That did it; Nautilus behaves, after a whole day, is only eating 40M. Well done! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441 Title: nautilus memory leak Status in “nautil

Re: [Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2012-01-09 Thread MFeif
Sure, that's an environment variable, I expect ... how do I set this so that it takes precedence? On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Could you try if running DESKTOP_SESSION=ubuntu nautilus makes things > better for you? > > -- You received this bug notification because

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2012-01-06 Thread MFeif
I'm in Gnome Shell. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441 Title: nautilus memory leak Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: There a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-12-21 Thread MFeif
So, Sebastien, what's the next step here. I think I've provided enough context to reproduce and prove that it is not some other setting on my system? I see that the bug is still "New"... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to n

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-12-08 Thread MFeif
FYI, I get the same behavior if I set the gstettings key and revert the xdg settings to "normal"... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441 Title: nautilus memory leak

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-12-08 Thread MFeif
"gsettings get org.gnome.nautilus.preferences desktop-is-home-dir" returns "false" I changed: XDG_DESKTOP_DIR="$HOME/" to XDG_DESKTOP_DIR="$HOME/Desktop" which stopped the problem. Changing it back started it again. Where are gsettings actually stored, and is dconf the same thing? -- You re

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-12-08 Thread MFeif
No, it does not happen; I found two places where this setting was set: 1. In gconf : apps / nautilus / preferences / desktop_is_home_dir (this setting appears to have no effect, but was a carry-over from an old version of Ubuntu. -- is nautilus gtk3 or gtk2 at this point?) 2. in .config/user-dir

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-12-07 Thread MFeif
Ok, after about 30m, I see the same familiar behavior... After starting at around 25M, nautilus is not sitting on 134.9MiB, rising 200-300KiB per second. Now what? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. http

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-12-07 Thread MFeif
Sigh. I let it run for about 15 minutes. I tried to "use" it, but like I said, it takes about 1m just to open a window. So I didn't use it "much". It's not possible to monitor the resource usage of nautilus when it's running inside of valgrind, because it's not in the System Monitor anymore... a

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-12-07 Thread MFeif
Ok, I did some tests... 1. When nautilus does NOT draw the desktop, memory use stays put at around 20M and does not grow. This is without moving the extension directory, so Dropbox and Kupfer could still be active. 2. If I move aside that extensions directory and restart nautilus, if it is set to

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-12-01 Thread MFeif
Thanks Sebastien. I'll try moving the extension dir out of the way and running nautilus as you suggest. Did you see my comment about looking at the memory map? Very little memory is claimed by those .so files, for whatever it's worth. -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-11-30 Thread MFeif
Ok, I quit Kupfer, I quit Dropbox, I killed Nautilus, then re-opened it; of course the desktop re-painted. I'm using Gnome-System-Monitor to watch. I'm watching the "Processes" tab. Nautilus started out eating ~ 26M of RAM at first. I have opened no file explorers, done nothing other than have th

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-11-30 Thread MFeif
I made another comment; it doesn't seem to be here! I have looked in the "memory map" feature of Gnome-System-Monitor, and the big chunk is "[heap]" currently sitting on 367MiB. The various .so files do appear below, but all are taking up almost no memory. Does this help? -- You received this

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-11-30 Thread MFeif
Sorry, you're right about python-nautilus! I did "aptitude show python-nautilus" and saw the "Automatically installed: no" and read it as "installed: no". My mistake. No applications seem to be using it, so I purged it. I understand your explanation, thanks for that. But I don't know how to proce

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-11-30 Thread MFeif
Sebastien, it's hard to tell; I have nautilus painting the desktop, so it's always "in use". I don't have a solid opinion about this, but yes, it *seems* to happen ALWAYS, but worse when there is a lot of nautilus use. I am using kupfer, yes... but there is no nautilus plugin, so if Kupfer is usin

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] [NEW] nautilus memory leak

2011-11-14 Thread MFeif
Public bug reported: There are other bug reports with this description, but they are either 3-4 years old, or closed, or invalid, or expired. I'm not doing anything exotic, but after about an hour or two of using my system (not even copying or moving files, or thumbnailing, or...) memory usage in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 890441] Re: nautilus memory leak

2011-11-14 Thread MFeif
** Attachment added: "valgrind.log.bz2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441/+attachment/2596932/+files/valgrind.log.bz2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890441 Tit

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 881581] Re: eog hangs when trying to display any image

2011-10-25 Thread MFeif
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to eog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/881581 Title: eog hangs when trying to display any image Status in “eog” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: EOG used to work; now

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 881581] [NEW] eog hangs when trying to display any image

2011-10-25 Thread MFeif
Public bug reported: EOG used to work; now trying to run it on any image, it just hangs. Running in the console hangs too; there is no output. After about 20 seconds, I get " GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: Timeout was reached " Nothing shows up in .xsession-errors. Sorry this isn't probably a very usef

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 841222] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch()

2011-09-04 Thread MFeif
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841222 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_main_context_dispatch() Status in “nautilus” package