This is fixed in the 23.10 dailies. I'm not sure it's really practical
to fix this for the next 22.04 point release, unfortunately.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: subiquity
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this
I have experienced this (or something very like this) a few times on my
t14 amd gen 3, which does not have dual GPUs. I only updated to
libmutter 45 this morning though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
lintian errors do not count as a build failure. You could file this as a
bug in Debian if you like -- we'll pick up the fix from there in due
course.
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
fontconfig 2.13.1-4.4ubuntu1 built successfully for me in a kinetic
sbuild so I think this can be closed.
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
This just needs to be backported to Jammy now?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992688
Title:
firefox deb not installed
Status in firefox package in Ubuntu:
New
The version of subiquity in 22.04.1 supports this now.
** Changed in: subiquity
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-drivers-common in Ubuntu.
Didier merged a better version of the fix I uploaded so presumably he'll
upload that soon and we can see where things fall.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962170
Title:
Hm no, if I apply this patch (or something like it)
https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/vVTyzHMqvr/ the build succeeds. Wtf.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962170
Title:
DEP8
So fwiw the build failure on ppc64el is hanging on the the call to
io.ReadAll(stderr) in SetupSmb (i.e. here:
https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/blob/v0.8/internal/testutils/samba.go#L38).
No idea why, but my sense from poking around is that the test has
already failed when the hang occurs so maybe
Public bug reported:
I'm pretty sure that "ubuntu-drivers install --gpgpu" will install
something if and only if "ubuntu-drivers list --gpgpu" has non-empty
output, but the logic of which of the things list returns gets installed
seems a bit non-trivial
The context for this is in the server
Public bug reported:
Reported upstream as https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gcr/-/issues/84.
Looks like it might be a flaky test?
** Affects: gcr (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: ftbfs update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Tags added: rls-gg-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to udisks2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888062
Title:
autopkgtest became very flaky in Groovy
Status in udisks2 package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
I fixed this upstream https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-system-
monitor/-/commit/c031de0a3469faf5020768de506c6169e1e71ac0, not sure if
there will be a release before focal or if this should be cherrypicked.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1862478 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862478
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1862478
gnome-system-monitor can't measure network transfer rate
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
The package looks fine to me now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-report in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1759540
Title:
[MIR] ubuntu-report: send telemetry data to ubuntu server
Status in
Doko asked me to look at the package and it seems OK to me on a quick
glance. (Only spent a few minutes, let me know if you'd like a deeper
review!)
On the packaging side, I'm a bit surprised at the use of go:generate to
create the shared lib but it works I guess. Another thing that's more on
the
I had a quick look at unbound, it seems quite difficult. People who
install unbound probably want it so they can have DNSSEC supported in
their local resolver which we can't really do by integrating with
resolved. OTOH, if installing unbound replaces (in some sense) resolved
and everything else
Public bug reported:
Ever since version 2.6.5-2ubuntu1, the autopkgtest for udisks2 has been
very flaky (failing ~80% of the time) on ppc64el:
http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/u/udisks2/artful/ppc64el
We attempted to debug a little and managed to reproduce in a VM but we
got confused
Public bug reported:
The build of the test package fails with:
make[6]: Leaving directory '/tmp/tmp9tnlt7ag/melticecream'
dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=binary
dpkg-genbuildinfo: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found;
.buildinfo is meaningless
dpkg-buildpackage: error:
This will end up blocking the enablement of python 3.6 as a supported
version. Any idea who might know how to fix this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pygobject in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1679831
Title:
In fact it seems once we merge clamav we can drop llvm-toolchain-3.6
entirely, or at least demote it from main.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to llvm-toolchain-3.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632357
Title:
The request seems fine but 1:3.6.2-4 seems to have been removed from
sid. What's going on? Do we still want to sync it? (I presume copy-
package can be persuaded to copy a deleted package...). If there are not
going to be any more updates I guess there's not a lot of point...
** Changed in:
Ah sorry, I invalidated it because the original reporter asked me to.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572493
Title:
pulseaudio 8.0 drops connections after playing
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572493
Title:
pulseaudio 8.0 drops connections after playing audio
FWIW, I haven't seen this for a few months now. It's always hard when
things are so intermittent, but I think it might be fixed...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1467595
25 matches
Mail list logo
