> This is a bug of libglib2.0-0 because its postrm purge removes it > unconditionnaly even if the package is still installed on another > architecture. > > Cf the extract below of /var/lib/dpkg/info/libglib2.0-0:i386.postrm > if [ "$1" = purge ] && [ -d /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas ]; then > # Purge the compiled schemas > rm -f /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled > rmdir -p --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas > fi
Yes, I saw the same, but I did not look after the problem deeply, so I thought dpkg is unaware of this kind of problem. Sorry for rhe bug report addressed to the unappropriate package and thanks for correcting me so fast! balazs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884979 Title: purging a package for different architecture may delete files needed for the actual architecture Status in “glib2.0” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: After installing adobe-flashplugin on my 64-bit system (11.10) I removed all the packages for i386 architecture. Then I purged them. After restarting the machine, the default Ubuntu session stopped working. I found that when I purged package libglib2.0-0:i386, dpkg deleted the file /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled. However it also belongs to libglib2.0-0. I supposed that the library missed this file, because after copying it back, my box started to work again. I do not know, if it is a serious problem, but dpkg should handle these cases, when there are packages installed for different architectures. May hard linking the same files prevent unwanted deletion? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/884979/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
