Hi Olivier, sorry for the late reply but I'm in the middle of an
overseas relocation (UK > Spain) + holidays and I'm a bit off the grid
these days...
Thanks for your comment, and sorry for reporting it against the wrong
branch. Hopefully this will help having a better chromium package for
future r
Note that the Fedora package is installing this file into the deprecated
path /usr/share/appdata, instead of using the one specified by AppStream
since a while ago: /usr/share/metainfo.
I've filed a bug for Fedora in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591306, but I'm commenting
this expl
Public bug reported:
In order for Chromium Browser to integrate properly with software
centers (e.g. GNOME Software), an additional XML file with metadata
needs to be installed under /usr/share/metainfo, in the form of an
"AppData file", containing the relevant bits according to the AppStream
spec
No problem, happy to see the report and the patch are useful.
After all, shaving 50MB out of 260MB is quite something! :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to chromium-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742653
Sorry for dropping the ball on this one, for some reason I completely
missed all notifications and I only happened to find this bug today
almost by chance :-)
Anyway, if you don't mind me asking... I understand that my workaround
of passing --with-system-groups='lpadmin root' to configure when
bui
** Summary changed:
- chromium-browser 63+ package includes a 44MB binary only needed at build time
+ chromium-browser 63+ packages 51+ MB of binaries only needed at build time
** Summary changed:
- chromium-browser 63+ packages 51+ MB of binaries only needed at build time
+ chromium-browser 63+
I believe all it's needed is to patch the debian/rules file to add
`v8_context_snapshot_generator` to the TRASH list of files:
```
--- a/debian/rules 2017-12-07 08:40:06.0 +
+++ b/debian/rules 2018-01-11 10:59:39.168190995 +
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
override_dh_install-arch:
Public bug reported:
As mentioned in [1], it seems like the chromium-browser package might
be, since Chromium 63, packaging a new and pretty big (44MB) binary that
is not needed at run time, just at build time.
This binary is `/usr/lib/chromium-browser/v8_context_snapshot_generator`, which
is at
This looks to me as a duplicate of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lsb/+bug/840998
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066529
Title:
All jobs stopped, epson_inkjet_
I found this bug today in our downstream platform that is still using
evolution 3.10.1, and thought it would be relevant to mention that this
has been fixed usptream for bug
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731872, and also that the
patch from there applied cleanly on top of my 3.10.1, fi
I've been investigating this issue recently and can confirm that, while
this is not an issue in my Fedora machine with the very same version of
cups, cups-pk-helper and gnome-control-center installed, it is still
present in Ubuntu, due to what I believe it might be a bug in the way
CUPS is being pa
On my machine, which does have a Nvidia graphics card, the libhwloc-
plugins package is kept back as well. Forcing (simulated) installation
yields the following output:
user@host:~$ sudo apt-get -s install libhwloc-plugins
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading stat
For some files imported form MS Office the menus and HUD are not available.
If I create a new calc, everything is ok
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062757
Title:
1. Go to "Ubuntu Software Centre"
2. Search for Libreoffice
3. Go down to "Add-ons"
4. Check GTK+ libreoffice-gtk3
5. Go up and install
SOLVED
It now shows the menu and the HUD!!!
I solved it on a freshly installed Ubuntu 12.10 64bit (which installed
Libreoffice 3.6.2.2 bu default)
--
You receiv
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1062757 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062757
1. Go to "Ubuntu Software Centre"
2. Search for Libreoffice
3. Go down to "Add-ons"
4. Check GTK+ libreoffice-gtk3
5. Go up and install
SOLVED
It now shows the menu and the HUD!!!
I solved it on a freshly in
Hi Amit, I found this bug:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22693
Then I made this test:
When I disconect the network libreoffice opens in less than 2 seconds
When I connect the net it opens in 17 seconds.
When I just open write it is fast, then, when I open -> recent -> test.odt
(from the Write m
Hi Jack:
-I opened the .odt sample file 4 times and it took the same 18 seconds.
-I installed the add-on with an Openerp wizard
-Attached is a screen capture showing that the addon is still present even
after I clicked remove several times and restarted.
-Is there another way to remove the addon?
Hi Jack, thanks a lot for your time, to follow your advice I tested with old
and new files, and the problem is only with the new files I create and then
load, does not matter if they are odt or doc.
I am wondering if the problem comes from an Openerp_report_designer addon that
I installed and I
Hi Christopher, I just discovered that the long delay problem is with files I
save as doc instead of odt.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833220
Title:
Libr
Hi Christopher, thanks for your fast reply. I dont understand, does it mean
that to open a document from Nautilus, it is normal and not a bug to wait for
17 seconds? It does not make any sense, I had not seen something so slow in
maaany years.
Using the terminal to navigate several directories a
Public bug reported:
If I open a LibreOffice app from menu, it takes about 1 second, but if I
double click any document from Nautilus it takes about 19 seconds, most
of the time I have the LibreOffice logo box and nothing is happening. I
looked for "LibreOffice slow to load" and find solutions abo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833220
Title:
LibreOffice pauses loading when starting a document from nautilus
Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bu
22 matches
Mail list logo
