FTR I do currently have /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse running as part of the
gvfs-daemon service.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075247
Title:
gvfs-fused not running on noble,
Note however that gutenprint shipped already in noble on armhf, rebuilt
with 64-bit time_t. We should not introduce a library transition
between noble and oracular, for an ABI transition that happened between
jammy and noble.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desk
** Package changed: pam (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080821
Title:
Custom caps lock action inconsistent on login screen
Status
> * Add fibocom mbim service to libmbim
It is very unclear here what you mean by 'service'. From this
description I would have expected to see the addition of a systemd
service unit to the package, but there is none. The changelog is
inadequate for an SRU to explain to users what is being done.
A debdiff is attached for jammy, but there is a task still open for the
devel series. What is the status of this in later releases?
** Changed in: libmbim (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subsc
i386 has been enabled by default on amd64 for quite some time.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232
Title:
Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
Sta
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232
Title:
Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls GDM
Status in gnome-shell package in U
The only thing is, installing updates through the GUI default upgrader
is NOT supposed to accept solutions that require removing packages. So
this really needs to be tracked down and fixed. I don't think there's
anything further to be done in gnome-shell.
** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Ok, sorry for overlooking.
Here's what it should look like:
$ apt policy gnome-shell
gnome-shell:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 42.9-0ubuntu2.2
Version table:
42.9-0ubuntu2.2 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.u
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077232
Title:
Security update 42.9-0ubuntu2.2 uninstalls
Upgrade: gnome-shell-common:amd64 (42.9-0ubuntu2.1, 42.9-0ubuntu2.2)
Remove: gnome-shell:amd64 (42.9-0ubuntu2.1),
This shows only gnome-shell-common being installed and gnome-shell being
removed. What does `apt policy` show for these two packages?
--
You received this bug notification because
Override component to main
sysprof 47~beta-1 in oracular: universe/devel -> main
1 publication overridden.
Override component to main
libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular amd64:
universe/libdevel/optional/100% -> main
libsysprof-capture-4-dev 47~beta-1 in oracular arm64:
universe/libdev
This is a straight swap, so no review needed.
Override component to main
mozjs128 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular: universe/libs -> main
libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% ->
main
libmozjs-128-0 128.0-0ubuntu1 in oracular arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% ->
I'll try to reproduce with a clean profile when I have a moment.
In the meantime, could you tell me what systemd user unit the process is
part of on your system? I don't see anything in the gvfs-fuse package
itself that would start it as part of a user session.
--
You received this bug notificat
Did you rule out the option of early-install'in systemd-resolved during
the upgrade? Then there wouldn't need to be special-casing of
resolv.conf because it wouldn't be "gone"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to firefox in Ubu
Public bug reported:
gvfs-fuse remains part of the Ubuntu Desktop in 24.04, however, I see in
my session that it is not running and as a result there are no mounts
available. I have Android mobile devices that I expect to be able to
access via fuse.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
P
Hello Simon, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-session into noble-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
session/46.0-1ubuntu4.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
Hello Helga, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apport into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/2.28.1-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
An upload of gnome-software to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "not an SRU, should be synced to
oracular".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://
An upload of gnome-software to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "not an SRU, should be synced to
oracular".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-software in Ubuntu.
https://
Hello theofficialgman, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator into noble-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator/58-1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Pleas
sorry, the template is there but I had loaded this page yesterday and
not refreshed!
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Tags added: ver
Hello iMac, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator into noble-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator/58-1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us b
Hello theofficialgman, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator into noble-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-
appindicator/58-1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Pleas
An upload of gnome-shell-extension-appindicator has been uploaded to
noble for this issue, but this bug lacks an SRU test case.
** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
ing when handling the massive Y2028 time_t
transition when upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS.
It was identified that dropping the libglib2.0-0 transitional package
can help apt do things in the correct order.
Technically, Steve Langasek already removed libglib2.0-0 from noble
release just bef
An upload of xdg-desktop-portal to noble-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "merge changelog includes
references to long-fixed bugs, needs cleanup".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to x
An upload of xdg-desktop-portal to noble-proposed has been rejected from
the upload queue for the following reason: "merge changelog includes
references to long-fixed bugs, needs cleanup".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to x
Public bug reported:
Currently, desktop-file-utils lists the snap store as the default
handler for Debian packages:
$ grep debian /usr/share/applications/defaults.list
application/vnd.debian.binary-package=snap-store_ubuntu-software-local-file.desktop
application/x-debian-package=snap-store_ubun
** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu)
Milestone: ubuntu-24.04 => noble-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to webkit2gtk in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037015
Title:
Screen corruption of webkit2gtk apps i
recent discussion out-of-band suggested this might have been a rpi-
specific failure, is that accurate?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libcanberra in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060693
Title:
No welcome/lo
This is targeted to 24.04 and marked as 'in progress' but is definitely
not landing before 24.04 GA on Thursday. What is the overall plan here?
should this go to SRU? (It can, but in that case doesn't benefit users
wrt the corruption issue in the *installer* until 24.04.1.)
--
You received this
** Changed in: c2esp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to c2esp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059157
Title:
proposed-migration for cups 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu1
Status in c
** Changed in: c2esp (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to c2esp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059281
Title:
libcupsfilters 2.0.0-0ubuntu6 results in autopkgtest re
still tagged 'time-t' because it's in the batch of test regressions
we've allowed as part of the time_t migration
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gtk4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059158
Title:
proposed-m
Since this bug report was filed, there has been a security update of
gst-plugins-good1.0 in jammy which built successfully. Closing invalid.
** Changed in: gst-plugins-good1.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Package
c2esp autopkgtest still fails with the current cups in noble-proposed -
though it appears to fail differently now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059157
Title:
proposed-
** Description changed:
- click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on ppc64el,
- s390x.
+ click 0.5.2-2 is stuck in -proposed. autopkgtest now fails on all archs
+ except amd64.
In order to be able to run the tests without all-proposed=1, glib 2.0 is
needed, which is why
** Changed in: ubuntu-unity-backgrounds (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-wallpapers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056591
Title:
[UIFe] Noble Flavor Wallpa
Public bug reported:
gtk4 4.14.1+ds-0ubuntu1 is stuck in -proposed with test regressions on
armhf.
1706s # Running test: gtk-4.0/tools/settings.test
1706s # FAIL: gtk-4.0/tools/settings.test (Child process exited with code 126)
1706s not ok - gtk-4.0/tools/settings.test
2100s # Running test: gtk
Public bug reported:
multiple cups-related packages are having test failures on armhf after time_t
transition.
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/c/c2esp/noble/armhf
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-browsed/2.0.0-0ubuntu9
I am suspecting a common cups-based issue.
cups-browsed alr
marking critical because these packages are being allowed into the
release pocket as-is but the printing stack may be broken, which is of
high importance in a server/embedded context.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups i
Thanks! Since this issue was seen only with the package in -proposed,
I'm closing this bug.
There are other unrelated test failures now blocking the build on
armhf. I will open a separate bug for these.
** Changed in: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Change
Public bug reported:
cups-browsed 2.0.0-0ubuntu9 is stuck in -proposed with test failures on
armhf.
** Affects: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: time-t update-excuse
** Tags added: time-t
** Description changed:
- cups-browsed 2.0.0-0ubuntu9 is s
** Tags removed: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to remmina in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057842
Title:
FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
Status in freerdp3 package in Ubuntu:
Fix Releas
Public bug reported:
gnome-remote-desktop 46~rc-0ubuntu2 is built in -proposed but not on
armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being
removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf
availability of this package in 24.04 LTS.
** Affects: gnome-re
[1724567.629003] audit: type=1400 audit(1711133926.877:813):
apparmor="DENIED" operation="file_mmap" class="file"
namespace="root//lxd-noble-armhf_"
profile="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed" name="/usr/sbin/cups-browsed"
pid=876865 comm="cups-browsed" requested_mask="rm" denied_mask="rm"
fsuid=1000110 ouid=
somehow
ONLY runs as ./debian/cups-browsed/usr/sbin/cups-browsed and segfaults
when invoked as /usr/sbin/cups-browsed.
** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: cups-browsed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Steve Langasek (vorlon
Public bug reported:
cpdb-backend-cups 2.0~b5-0ubuntu5 has a build-time test failure on
armhf.
** Affects: cpdb-backend-cups (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: time-t update-excuse
** Tags added: time-t
** Description changed:
- cpdb-backend-cups 2.0~b5-0ubuntu
mesa bootstrap had not been unwound all the way. Fixed mesa is building
now.
** Package changed: auto-multiple-choice (Ubuntu) => mesa (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langase
** Package changed: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-raspi-settings
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057822
Title:
Removing irqbalance disables power button
The UI Freeze exists to ensure that documentation team and translation
team efforts aren't wasted working on a UI that isn't finalized.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#UserInterfaceFreeze_Exceptions
UIFreeze granted, provided you notify ubuntu-...@lists.ubuntu.com in
advance.
** C
I've sponsored this for noble. For the SRUs, I would like to see a test
case explicitly included that says you will regression-test this on
other bluetooth pairings on other devices: the patch is not a platform-
specific quirk, it is a change to generic bluetooth code, so there
should be explicit
Belated response, but just for the record, Paride's recounting of upstream's
position in the context of the Debian decision was definitive for me:
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:47:56AM -, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Back in the day I asked upstream their take on irqbalance usefulness
> with newer ke
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:51:46PM -, Philip Roche wrote:
> @vorlon @jchittum @paelzer given the above findings are you still -1 on
> any snap preseeding? Based on the data, I vote not to preseed any snaps.
That is my position. Thanks for bringing data to this!
--
You received this bug noti
> This is a significant difference and for a workload we intend to remain as a
> core tested
> and tracked workload. As such I propose we re-introduce core22 and snapd
> snaps to our seed.
I disagree that the image should be optimized by default to prioritize
the one-time startup performance of
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble amd64
libnvidia-cfg1-510-server 515.105.01-0ubuntu2 in noble arm64
libnvidia-common-510-server
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-cfg1-455 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-450 460.91.03-0ubuntu1 in noble am
All older source packages listed in this bug report have been removed,
and yet:
$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-460
Reverse-Depends
===
* libnvidia-decode-455 (for libnvidia-decode-460)
* libnvidia-encode-455 (for libnvidia-encode-460)
* nvidia-headless-
Same for 515-server:
$ reverse-depends src:nvidia-graphics-drivers-515-server
Reverse-Depends
===
* libnvidia-decode-510-server (for libnvidia-decode-515-server)
* libnvidia-encode-510-server (for libnvidia-encode-515-server)
Packages without architectures listed are reverse-depen
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-440 450.119.03-0ubuntu1 in no
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-430 440.100-0ubuntu1 in noble arm64
Hi Christian,
I see a lot of strong opinions being given, but aside from the "don't
use it in KVM" guidance which appears to be based on GCE's engineering
expertise, very little evidence that irqbalance is actually a problem.
I think it's true that in the default config, irqbalance can interfere
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 515.105.01-0ubuntu3 in noble
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-515 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug no
The other packages in this listed are reported by reverse-depends to
have non-empty revdeps. However it looks like these all come from other
packages that have just been removed. Rather than tracing this manually
and possibly making a mistake, I'll let the others sit for another
round.
--
You r
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-510 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-495 510.108.03-0ubuntu3 in no
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 530.41.03-0ubuntu2 in noble
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-530 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug not
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-455 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-435 455.45.01-0ubuntu1 in noble
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 435.21-0ubuntu8 in noble
Comment: Unsupported driver version; LP: #2048087
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notifi
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble
libnvidia-cfg1-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble amd64
libnvidia-common-418 430.50-0ubuntu3 in noble arm64
Removing packages from noble:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble
libcuda1-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble amd64
libcuda1-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble armhf
nvidia-340 340.108-0ubuntu8 in noble amd64
nvidia-340
Hello Laider, or anyone else affected,
Accepted modemmanager into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modemmanager/1.20.0-1~ubuntu22.04.3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new packag
Hello Daniel, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
Hello Jeremy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
Hello Jeremie, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wik
Hello Gonzalo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mutter into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mutter/45.2-0ubuntu3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wik
One of the possible impacts of bumping the version like this is that if
a user has a local deb of chromium-browser installed that is higher than
the current version, the new epoch will cause them to be upgraded to the
transitional package that they had already opted out of.
This should be called o
One of the possible impacts of bumping the version like this is that if
a user has a local deb of chromium-browser installed that is higher than
the current version, the new epoch will cause them to be upgraded to the
transitional package that they had already opted out of.
This should be called o
I actually agree that we should aim to remove these packages entirely,
rather than merely demoting them.
I think removal of the server is a clear-cut case. Nobody should need
to run a pptp server nowadays on Ubuntu, and if anyone is, forcing them
to migrate to a better VPN solution on upgrade (or
LP: #2048087 has been opened with a superset of removal requests, so
marking invalid the tasks here in favor of that separate bug with
independent history.
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-430 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-435 (Ubuntu)
Removing packages from noble:
pptpd 1.4.0-12build2 in noble
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble amd64
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble arm64
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble armhf
bcrelay 1.4.0-12build2 in noble ppc64el
** Description changed:
Remove dangerously insecure MPPE PPTP from Ubuntu
https://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/protocol-security.phtml
It has been dead for over 20 years now.
- IPSec OpenVPN Strongswan are much better alternatives.
+ Current Windows versions natively support IPSec and
Removing packages from noble:
signon 8.59+17.10.20170606-0ubuntu3 in noble
Comment: superseded by signond; LP: #2046971
1 package successfully removed.
** Changed in: signon (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des
The verification of the Stable Release Update for mutter has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
>From the linked page:
However, that doesn't mean people don't accept the risks. There are many
corporations and individuals using PPTP with full knowledge of these
risks. Some use mitigating controls, and some don't.
No one has ever run pptp on Linux, as either a client or server, because
they t
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046360
Title:
Heavy stuttering in Firefox with mutter 45.1/45.2
Status
The unit is called 'NetworkManager-wait-online.service' not
'NetworkManager-wait-online-service.service'.
** Package changed: plymouth (Ubuntu) => network-manager (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
** Changed in: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039104
Title:
ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu
** Tags added: block-proposed-mantic
** Description changed:
+ [SRU Justification]
+
In response to LP: #2038964 and due to the timing we have forked ubuntu-
raspi-settings into a separate source package.
ubuntu-settings must therefore be updated to drop ubuntu-raspi-settings*
from de
Hello Mate, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
The directx-headers part of this is easy because it's just a build-
dependency of mesa, but mesa itself is a big delta to a library that
affects all users of the graphics stack: unlike the kernel, which has
both GA and HWE versions where the user can opt out of the rolling
kernel updates on the LTS
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted directx-headers into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/directx-
headers/1.610.2-2~ubuntu0.22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
I'd really recommend not open new bug tasks for further source packages
on a bug like this; we clearly aren't going to remove any of those other
packages from mantic now...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-d
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 05:34:02PM -, Dave Jones wrote:
> Thanks for the quick review! Could someone set up a "mantic" branch
Done.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Hello Dimitri, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-meta into mantic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
meta/1.524.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
ubuntu-meta sponsored to noble, but no bug ref in changelog, so marking
this fix released for noble.
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verifica
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:36:16PM -, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> What are the consequences of delaying NetworkManager's restart until
> reboot?
This is not an option on upgrade from <= 23.04 to >= 23.10 because the
postinst needs the new NetworkManager running for the connections migration.
--
Yo
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:04:25PM -, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> I do not believe we have a desktop policy to help us determine when it
> is better to either restart services or notify that a computer restart
> is recommended.
As a user I would prefer to not have my vpn connection drop during a
net
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu Mantic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnom
1 - 100 of 1004 matches
Mail list logo
