AFAIK ^ has never worked correctly. I doubt anyone intentionally made Open
Office regular expressions incompatible with industry practice, so I think this
is a bug, not a missing feature.
-Jim
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
Incidentally $ does match the end of paragraphs (as documented), but
seems to match the paragraph break (not just tne -position- at the end
of the paragraph), so paragraphs are merged forming a single new
paragraph. Except only one of a group of successive empty paragraphs is
matched.
Matching
No. ^. is not equivalent. ^. means to match the first character on
the line, and if doing a replace then the first character would be
deleted. ^ by itself matches the start of the line (not including any
characters), and replacing it with something effectively inserts the
replacement text at
If you are unsure how regular expression syntax should work (in
industry-wide practice), there are many books and online references, for
example
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#POSIX_Basic_Regular_Expressions
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Attachment added: pdfform.pdf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061777/+attachment/3372537/+files/pdfform.pdf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061777
Title:
Public bug reported:
If a PDF form is filled out using acroread and saved, then printing the
resulting pdf using 'lpr'
results in a blank form, with none of the filled-out field data.
However the filled-out field data -does- show if the file is first
opened with evince and printed from within
Public bug reported:
Libre Office's export-to-pdf generates huge and often-unprintable PDFs
even from single-page documents. There is something wrong with LO's pdf
export specifically, because printing to the cups-pdf PDF-generator
produces a usable PDF file (also less than half the size), and
** Attachment added: PDF produced by cups-pdf printer device, which works
fine
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1040345/+attachment/3272615/+files/Test_PrintedToCupsPdf.pdf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is
** Attachment added: Test.odt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040345/+attachment/3272612/+files/Test.odt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040345
Title:
** Attachment added: Test.pdf - result of export-to-pdf (unprintable for me)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1040345/+attachment/3272614/+files/Test.pdf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
This bug does not occur with Open Office 3.3.0 or Libre Office 3.4.4 on
Windows 7.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040345
Title:
Export-to-PDF produces
Upstream bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52504
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #52504
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52504
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in
Public bug reported:
In the print dialog, if Number of Copies is set to 50 then 50
separate, independent print jobs are spooled. It should submit a single
print job, specifying 50 copies. This will allow the printer to do the
replication if it can (all Postscript printers can).
This is
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025839
Title:
Printing multiple copies submits multiple separate jobs (should submit
one job)
Status in “libreoffice” package in
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: Expired = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961723
Title:
Brasero's info docs are missing
Status in “brasero” package
Problem still exists in Precise (12.04)
** Description changed:
- The brasero man page says For a complete description [of the options], see
the Info files.
- but no info file is installed by the 'brasero' package, and there doesn't
seem to exist a 'brasero-doc' or similar package.
+ 'man
Thank you for responding so quickly.
The problem is not with Libre Office, but with the Ubuntu port or packaging of
Acrobat Reader.
I will open a new bug on acroread and close this one. Sorry for the
mis-direction.
-
The *same* PDF file prints ok from xpdf on Ubuntu, or Acrobat
** Attachment added: AcrobatTestImage.pdf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997728/+attachment/3140368/+files/AcrobatTestImage.pdf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Certain images are substantially degraded when printing.
The problem only occurs with Acrobat Reader on Ubuntu,
not xpdf or Acrobat Reader on Windows 7 (using the same printer and input PDF).
So there is something wrong with Acrobat Reader on Ubuntu specifically (or
maybe
Public bug reported:
Export-to-PDF substantially degrades graphic images, even if Lossless
compression is selected in the export dialog.
The document, if printed directly from Libre Office Writer, produces noticably
higher quality than the same document
printed from PDF, to the same printer.
A
** Attachment added: PDFExportGraphicDegradation.odt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997417/+attachment/3139326/+files/PDFExportGraphicDegradation.odt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
When burning an Audio CD, if a directory containing tracks is added, the user
is prompted search directory for tracks?.
If the user says yes, then the tracks in that directory are added TWICE.
So, for example, if an album-directory is added which contains 5 tracks,
the
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961503
Title:
Tracks added twice to audio CD when adding directory
Status in “brasero” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Public bug reported:
If symlinks to track files (in flac format) are added to an Audio CD
project, an error pop-up occurs for each one saying it is not a valid
file format.
The exact same files work fine if referenced directly, not via symlinks.
This seems silly; something must be explicitly
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961712
Title:
brasero chokes on symlinked audio track files
Status in “brasero” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
If
Public bug reported:
The brasero man page says For a complete description [of the options], see the
Info files.
but no info file is installed by the 'brasero' package, and there doesn't seem
to exist a 'brasero-doc' or similar package.
I'm guessing that the info files were omitted from the
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to brasero in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961723
Title:
Brasero's info docs are missing
Status in “brasero” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
The brasero man page
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to banshee in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/911555
Title:
banshee does not see smart playlists in iPOD which it created
Status in “banshee” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug
Public bug reported:
Banshee does not see smart playlists in the iPOD, even if those playlists were
previously created by banshee
(I haven't tried dumb playlists, so don't know if the problem is specifically
with smart playlists).
As a result, each time a library sync is done, a duplicate set
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: firefox
+
+ Summary:
+ wget -O test.htm
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/534606/+attachment/1198072/+files/test.htm
+ firefox -new-window test.htm
+ Adjust window so only about 15 lines are visible
+ Control-F and enter K-1 as
Also on linux (lowriter 3.4.4).Could we have an update, e.g. are
developers looking at this?
Something was broken since OpenOffice 3.3. So looking at the changes
might help.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Doing File-Export as PDF permanently breaks the Show non-printing
characters feature. rm -rf $HOME/.libreoffice fixes the problem
(until the next Export As PDF).
Investigation showed that .libreoffice/3/user/registrymodifications.xcu
changed during 'Export As PDF' in
** Attachment added: .libreoffice/3/user/registrymodifications.xcu BEFORE the
breakage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/904046/+attachment/2632235/+files/registrymodifications.xcu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
** Attachment added: .libreoffice/3/user/registrymodifications.xcu after the
breakage
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904046/+attachment/2632231/+files/registrymodifications.xcu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to
** Description changed:
- In Ubuntu Software Center, the Reviews often seem inconsistent with from
- the number of stars or the number or ratings shown next to the stars.
+ In Ubuntu Software Center, the Reviews often seem inconsistent with the
+ stars or the number of ratings displayed for
Public bug reported:
If a system monitor is placed in the Gnome Panel and 'Network' is
enabled, then hovering over the mineature Network graph in the Panel
causes the current Receiving Sending rates to be shown in a pop-up
window.
However these values appear to be incorrect, usually lower than
** Attachment added: Screenshot.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888314/+attachment/2591282/+files/Screenshot.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu.
Yes, the problem is still there in Libre Office.
Example:
Help-LibreOffice Help
Select Libreoffice Basic in drop-down box in upper left
Search for if statement
Scroll to example code at the end of the page. The indentation, which
presumably was there in the original documentation format, has
The problem is still there in Libre Office 3.4.3
Unfortunately I attached the wrong bug demo file in comment #3 (it was
for a different problem). Sorry about that!
I will attach the correct demo file to this comment.
** Attachment added: bugdemo_redim_empty.ods
It seems to have been fixed in Libre 3.4.3 (tested writer calc).
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
