well files is the new user facing name they picked for their
browser,the same way they call totem videos or want to call their
photo app photo,they didn't rename the project,tarball,source etc
though.
But feel free to raise the issue on bugzilla.gnome.org, we have too many
issues there and lot of
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039654
Title:
files license still mentions nautilus
Status in “nautilus” package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
Files aka GNOME
Thanks for no thanks, the tarball upstream is still named nautilus as
are all of their sources, what sort of a bug is that?
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification
@Seb -- I was just confused why it's called files -- and if it's being
called Files, the license should reflect that as well.. The whole
thing is quite odd, since it is after all nautilus.. /me is confused
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which
4 matches
Mail list logo
