** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783
Title:
New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration
The newer versions added support for duktape and security team reviewed
and acked the corresponding MIR bug #1997417 now, moving forward we need
to address the MIR team feedback on duktape, migrate our rules to the
new format and resolve the autopkgtest issues found in the lunar cycle
** Descripti
** Tags added: version-blocked
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783
Title:
New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file format
Status in policykit-1 package i
Removing the block tag since we agreed to move forward with updating now
that there is a duketap backend
** Tags removed: version-blocked
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
An update on the current state of this:
- polkit upstream currently depends on mozjs60
- mozjs60 is in main, but only for the use of GNOME Shell.
- The current polkit Debian/Ubuntu package has 61 patches in it, backporting
lots of changes from version 106 to 116.
- There are upstream requests for
I've made a forum post asking for feedback from users of polkit in
Ubuntu (https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/use-of-javascript-rules-in-
polkit/13892). If you have comments please add them there instead of
this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages,
@Robert, I would start by getting the security team's input on using
mozjs or duktape, if it's a no go from their side then we know what are
our options.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783
Title:
New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #689473
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689473
** Also affects: policykit-1 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689473
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification becau
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783
Title:
New PolicyKit 0.106 changes configuration file form
version 0.110-3 is now in debian experimental and upstream is at 0.111.
Should we wait for debian to call it "polkit" or merge it now?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
Do not merge this for now. It is unlikely we will allow an insecure
library such as mozjs185 to be included in main, especially for
something as security-sensitive as policykit.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1
@mdeslaur
Hi any chance we can revisit this use case again and add mazjs185
through the MIR process for newer Ubuntu versions?
Thank you
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
mozjs hasn't gotten any security updates in _years_, so no, we're not
going to be able to support that package in main.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1086783
Title:
Could policykit be updated if it was ported to mozjs45?
It would be good if we could see it updated eventually as the javascript rules
are much more flexible (one use would be restricting users to specific domains
with libvirt).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
17 matches
Mail list logo