[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1093704] Re: Changing (enabling) 'sharing desktop' does not require user password

2013-01-07 Thread Sebastien Bacher
the software-center asks for a password because package installation is a system feature, the desktop sharing is purely an user one ** Changed in: vino (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: vino (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1093704] Re: Changing (enabling) 'sharing desktop' does not require user password

2013-01-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: vino (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to vino in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1093704 T

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1093704] Re: Changing (enabling) 'sharing desktop' does not require user password

2012-12-26 Thread KP Stolk
Like the Software Center also asks for the user's password because important changes happen to their system. So enabling sharing desktop is not important enough? You disagree? For now I removed the package because I don't want anybody to sneak into my pc without knowing it. -- You received this

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1093704] Re: Changing (enabling) 'sharing desktop' does not require user password

2012-12-25 Thread Marc Deslauriers
How is this a security issue? The setting is completely within a user's session. Asking for the user's password here would be security theatre. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to vino in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1093704] Re: Changing (enabling) 'sharing desktop' does not require user password

2012-12-25 Thread KP Stolk
** Description changed: I don't know if this is reported before, but I noticed that changing the - remote desktop option to allow viewing without any permission looks like - a real security problem. + remote desktop option to allow viewing/controlling without any + permission looks like a real s