3.11 is in saucy now, so marking bug as fixed.
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of D
opening again for saucy, although 3.11 will be there within the next day
or so
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-vid
Workaround that I put in for raring was presumed to be sufficient. Since
then we have identified and fixed the root cause, but that fix has yet
to even land in saucy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-inte
Noticed it was "Fix Released" for Raring, but problem appears to remain,
attached is screen shot showing corrupt image on right, and photo
showing different type of corruption that fixes itself if you take a
screen shot, below is my version information (13.04 64-bit after apt-get
update/upgrade/reb
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #66163
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66163
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xs
commit 22fd5ca947b58901927d100d2b1aa0f1672b3435
Author: Chris Wilson
Date: Fri Jun 28 16:54:08 2013 +0100
drm/i915: Only clear write-domains after a successful wait-seqno
In the introduction of the non-blocking wait, I cut'n'pasted the wait
completion code from normal locked pa
(In reply to comment #70)
> commit 22fd5ca947b58901927d100d2b1aa0f1672b3435
> Author: Chris Wilson
> Date: Fri Jun 28 16:54:08 2013 +0100
>
> drm/i915: Only clear write-domains after a successful wait-seqno
>
> In the introduction of the non-blocking wait, I cut'n'pasted the wait
>
This bug just reappeared with xf86-video-intel-2.21.10. Next thing I am
going to try is this commit you've posted above.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
(In reply to comment #68)
> It's back:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/
> 1189850
Thanks for the link. I've tried today's xf86-video-intel git with the
commit which is marked as a solution via link you provided. I can
confirm that I was unable to reproduce
It's back: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-
intel/+bug/1189850
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corru
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption in fire
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption in fire
(In reply to comment #66)
> Ok, having made a new release, it is time to see if anyone else is seeing
> this bug:
>
> commit 8e42637050275945200797538a34c13c90b295cc
> Author: Chris Wilson
> Date: Tue May 21 11:13:03 2013 +0100
>
> sna: Re-enable read-read optimisations
Thank you. I'll up
Ok, having made a new release, it is time to see if anyone else is
seeing this bug:
commit 8e42637050275945200797538a34c13c90b295cc
Author: Chris Wilson
Date: Tue May 21 11:13:03 2013 +0100
sna: Re-enable read-read optimisations
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
(In reply to comment #64)
> That's unexpected - those updates should have had no impact upon this issue.
> :|
Nevertheless, the overall look and feel in firefox was improved somehow.
Now I've updated mesa to 9.1.2 and kernel to 3.9.0 and these positive
effects are preserved.
The situation is much
Hello.
At last, there is some positive dynamic! Though I still from time to time see
corrupted rendering of certain elements on some pages, but at least I haven't
seen for a while any completely corrupted previews like it was before. Portions
of previews could be corrupted, but only those parts
That's unexpected - those updates should have had no impact upon this
issue. :|
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption in fir
Same issue with firefox 20 and xf86-video-intel 2.21.5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption in firefox when using "sna"
St
Well, I am still experiencing this issue even with latest intel driver
:(
Are you running Gentoo now? What is your setup? Could you please give me
the output of `emerge --info firefox` and `emerge --info xf86-video-
intel`?
I haven't tried Firefox 20 yet though. Could it be the issue in Firefox
i
I'm still using the optimized flushes on all of my machines and have yet
to encounter corruption. :|
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Ima
I was able to reproduce that stack trace from Xorg log and intel driver
is not an issue here at all.
I found out that the cause of this is the fast spinning mouse wheel. I
have a mouse with a wheel which can be scrolled like in 'free roam'
mode, without that 'clicks', you know. And if I scroll too
Ok, I have ff-19 built at last using gentoo ~amd64 on a lowly ilk. It
seems to be doing the right thing regarding using system-cairo and
server-side gradients. Next step is to piece together enough components
to see if I can reproduce the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
(In reply to comment #57)
> Ok, I have ff-19 built at last using gentoo ~amd64 on a lowly ilk. It seems
> to be doing the right thing regarding using system-cairo and server-side
> gradients. Next step is to piece together enough components to see if I can
> reproduce the bug.
Ok, tell me what inf
(In reply to comment #53)
> Reading
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/firefox/
> firefox-19.0.2.ebuild?view=markup it seems that the use of system-cairo has
> been dropped. Which is a shame.
You are not seeing thing like "we're enabling system cairo here ..."
dir
What do you think about comment #39? And how can I check if pixman time
shown in `perf top` belongs to Xorg or Firefox? (see comment #46)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
(In reply to comment #53)
> Reading
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/firefox/
> firefox-19.0.2.ebuild?view=markup it seems that the use of system-cairo has
> been dropped. Which is a shame.
Well, you've seen the patches applied on top of firefox and support for
(In reply to comment #53)
> Reading
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/firefox/
> firefox-19.0.2.ebuild?view=markup it seems that the use of system-cairo has
> been dropped. Which is a shame.
And the last one, you can find sources of eclasses in your
$PORTDIR/ecla
Reading http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-
client/firefox/firefox-19.0.2.ebuild?view=markup it seems that the use
of system-cairo has been dropped. Which is a shame.
On the positive news though the latest unstable cairo has dropped the
buggy gradients patch (unless legacy
(In reply to comment #51)
> If you have the ncurses gui, the second column shows you the "comm" i.e. the
> process name. Similarly in the perf report.
Oh, finally, I was able to get it. Yes, that pixman rendering belongs to
Firefox process, not Xorg. Though there is somehow no "comm" column in
my
If you have the ncurses gui, the second column shows you the "comm" i.e.
the process name. Similarly in the perf report.
I'm trying to install gentoo to see if that helps (the prospect of a
modern ff using system cairo is very appealing).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Launchpad has imported 50 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61628.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://hel
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Raring)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Ima
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Raring)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Imag
I no longer get the issue with the version from xorg-edgers either
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption in firefox when usi
@Chris: sorry for the delay, I didn't run into the issue so often before
so I wanted to give it some testing time, it seems good to me so far,
thanks for the fix!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in
re 1131134, I mistaken hit the 'fix released' too soon, it didn't make
the 2.21.3 cut as I had believed.
Anyway, I would like confirmation that xorg-edgers fixes these observed
issues before making 2.21.4 which I want to do asap...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Pete, are you running current raring? It should have the commit from
1131134 already.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption
No, that's bug 1131134.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption in firefox when using "sna"
Status in X.org xf86-video-intel
I hit this bug on the date time setting screen. See attached screenshot
(plus & minus buttons)
** Attachment added: "window.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1144558/+attachment/3563878/+files/window.png
--
You received this bug notification because
** Tags added: corruption
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption in firefox when using "sna"
Status in X.org xf86-video-inte
Right, it will be in the following update to xorg-edgers. You can just
build it from xf86-video-intel.git... :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
T
(the version seems older than the comment about the fix so I will wait
for/try with the next update)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Ima
I still get the issue with that version:
ii xserver-xorg-video-intel
2:2.21.3+git20130306.779fc0b2-0ubuntu0sarvatt i386 X.Org X server --
Intel i8xx, i9xx display driver
(took the source from the xorg-edgers ppa and rebuilt it locally on
raring)
--
Y
Of course you can, I just picked xorg-edgers for convenience.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption in firefox when using "s
Can I rebuild the new intel package on raring? edgers has the new
xserver right? I would prefer stay on what is shipping in raring if
that's possible, I'm happy to rebuild the intel package and test it
though
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, whic
I've pushed a workaround for what I think is this bug to xf86-video-
intel, can people try xorg-edgers in the next day or so and see if it
fixes this one as well?
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Raring)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification b
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Raring)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Ima
@Chris: ok, thanks for the details, let me know if I can help testing a
fix!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corruption in firefo
Also there are some patches in ppa:xorg-edgers that will help, but I'm
still hunting the root cause.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Ima
There's a transient misrender in gen4 (a flicker that gets redrawn
differently every time, normally correctly): 1098489. I mention it so
that we don't automatically confuse the two, though this upstream bug
will affect all gen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Des
sorry but what chipsets are gen4? that bug is about the i5 issue and we
should open a new one about i965?
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug not
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #61628
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
** Also affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel via
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61628
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification becaus
Please separate out gen4 reports as that GPU has known issues that need
to be addressed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
Images corrupti
Here's an example from bugzilla.mozilla.org
** Attachment added: "Selection_038.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1144558/+attachment/3556660/+files/Selection_038.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages
(the xorg.conf there has uxa since I was asked to try if that fixes the
corruption issue, and it does)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1144558
Title:
I
Public bug reported:
Since "sna" is in using in raring users are reporting pixmap corruptions
in firefox, I see the issue on an i5 cpu. The same problem has been
reported by i965 users as well
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVer
56 matches
Mail list logo
