** Changed in: xfce4-session (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Summary changed:
- Resuming from suspend flashes the desktop, then shows unlocking dialog
+ xscreensaver-command is slow at locking
** Changed in: xfce4-session
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: xfce4-
Jarno, the important bug is not in xscreensaver but in whatever calls
xscreensaver-command. However there is also an issue in xscreensaver
that makes the other bug much more prominent. I therefore have kept this
bug report for tracking the xscreensaver part, which is fixed in
xscreensaver 5.22-1.
There are two older bug reports about this issue, namely Bug #423930 and
Bug #1054299 . I think this one should be marked as a duplicate of
either one. This one was originally reported agains xfce4-session, but
in later comments fixing has been tried to do in xscreensaver's code.
Please see
https:/
The attachment "patch from Debian" seems to be a patch. If it isn't,
please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch"
tag, and if you are a member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the
team.
[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by
~brian-murr
** Patch added: "patch from Debian"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1229486/+attachment/3883280/+files/15_upstream_activate_faster_nontty.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xscreensaver i
Upstream is favorable to the isatty() hack. I have sent him a patch, and
I will also apply it in Debian's 5.22-1 (to be released real soon). I
have also applied this to the pre-release in my PPA if anyone wants to
test it.
Thaddäus, can you please advice in bug 1054299 on which program is
calling
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: xscreensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to xscreensaver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Thaddäus, that is well spotted and a good idea. The existing sleep(1)
call is kind of a hack. Maybe it can be enhanced with another hack: Skip
the sleep if isatty() returns failure. I will ask upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is s
The Xfce session runs "xscreensaver-command -lock" to lock the screen.
This command waits exactly 1 second before blanking/locking the screen
to make sure, that the screen saver will not get deactivated on key
release. Bypassing this delay with an optional argument could improve
the situation.
**
9 matches
Mail list logo
