[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2015-04-14 Thread Treviño
Fix Released in bamf BAMF 0.5.1 "The Trusty BAMF". ** Changed in: bamf Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libunity-webapps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280337 Titl

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2015-04-14 Thread Treviño
** Changed in: bamf Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: bamf Assignee: (unassigned) => Alexandre Abreu (alexabreu-abreu) ** Changed in: bamf Milestone: None => 0.5.1 ** Changed in: bamf Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification be

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-04-14 Thread David Barth
** Changed in: bamf Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libunity-webapps Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: libunity-webapps (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which i

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-04-08 Thread Robert Bruce Park
Erk, it seems we have a small goofup here. Nobody bothered to rebuild the silo after Alex pushed more commits, so when I woke up today I saw dbarth's approval and published the silo. Then *after* I did the publish I saw that there were more commits, so I rebuilt and republished. So, the above vers

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-04-08 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package bamf - 0.5.1+14.04.20140407.1-0ubuntu1 --- bamf (0.5.1+14.04.20140407.1-0ubuntu1) trusty; urgency=low [ CI bot ] * Resync trunk [ Alexandre Abreu ] * Rip out vestigial webapps code (LP: #1280337) (LP: #1280337) [ Ubuntu daily release ] *

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-04-08 Thread David Barth
Works. +1 for landing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libunity-webapps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1280337 Title: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised Status in BAMF Application Matching Framew

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-04-08 Thread Mateusz Stachowski
I used the PPA and upgraded bamf. This solved the problem and Unity isn't removed when uninstalling webbrowser-app but as you mentioned in comment #6 the webapps are dead. $ sudo apt remove webbrowser-app Czytanie list pakietów... Gotowe Budowanie drzewa zależności Odczyt informacji o stan

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-04-07 Thread Robert Bruce Park
If anybody is interested in helping to test this, the fix is available in this PPA for the time being: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/landing-011 (make sure to disable this PPA after installing, because later on this PPA will contain other, unrelated components that might br

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-04-07 Thread Alexandre Abreu
** Also affects: libunity-webapps Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bamf Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Branch linked: lp:~abreu-alexandre/bamf/remove-webapps-deps -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, whic

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-04-07 Thread David Barth
I think you are right: we could get rid of the bamf / libunity-webapps link, or at least loosen the dependency between bamf and webapps. ** Tags added: webapps-hotlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libunity-webapps in U

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-04-07 Thread Robert Bruce Park
The dependency chain here looks like this: unity -> bamfdaemon -> libunity-webapps0 -> unity-webapps-service -> webapp-container -> webbrowser-app. My initial feeling was that bamfdaemon just shouldn't depend on libunity-webapps0, because we dropped a bunch of webapps code from bamf following the

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-03-08 Thread Alberto Salvia Novella
It severely affects packages beyond the one that causes the flaw. ** Changed in: libunity-webapps (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libunity-webapps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-02-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: libunity-webapps (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libunity-webapps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-02-14 Thread Robert Bruce Park
Whoa now, I didn't say anything about bamf. You're right that uninstalling webbrowser-app should not remove unity, but my understanding is that webapps are completely dead without webbrowser- app. So absolutely uninstalling webbrowser-app should pull out all webapps... I think the solution to this

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-02-14 Thread Doug McMahon
Well if you're getting rid of bamf this cycle then you can ignore this bug, otherwise you can't have your only available session depend on the installation of an easily removed web browser application I'm sure there is a better, safer way to achieve your purposes. -- You received this bug notif

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-02-14 Thread Robert Bruce Park
David, didn't we just rip out the support for firefox & chrome as containers this cycle? I thought the whole point of this dependency is that webbrowser-app is *the* container for doing webapps. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribe

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-02-14 Thread Doug McMahon
Just to note - Not sure what was up with the Dash before but "uninstall" on apps is now working. So in the case of webbrowser-app the uninstall option is front & center & will silently proceed to uninstall unity, ect. along with webbrowser-app package ** Description changed: So if a user dec

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1280337] Re: Dependency on webbrowser-app seems ill-advised

2014-02-14 Thread David Barth
Robert: can that dependency be turned into a recommend? The underlying code should be able to fallback to another webcontainer (like chrome) if available. ** Changed in: libunity-webapps (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert Bruce Park (robru) -- You received this bug notification becau