[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2021-11-10 Thread Ken Sharp
** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-font-viewer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332426 Title: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer Status in Default settings and artwork

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2016-11-01 Thread erio
.woff Font Files can be opened by the default Ubuntu Font Viewer (by right click->open with Other Application in Nautilus), but they are still not associated to it in Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gn

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2015-04-16 Thread Michael Heuberger
it is still happening on the latest ubuntu ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-font-viewer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332426 Title: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer Status in Def

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2015-04-03 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-font-viewer Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-font-viewer in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332426 Title: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-vie

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2014-06-30 Thread Mantas Kriaučiūnas
** Also affects: baltix-default-settings Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: baltix-default-settings Assignee: (unassigned) => Mantas Kriaučiūnas (mantas) ** Changed in: baltix-default-settings Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: baltix-default-settings

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2014-06-21 Thread Adolfo Jayme
** No longer affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332426 Title: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer Status in Gnome Font Viewer:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2014-06-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
thanks ** Changed in: gnome-font-viewer (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332426 Title: WOFF format not associated with gn

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2014-06-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-font-viewer Status: Unknown => New ** Changed in: gnome-font-viewer Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332426

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2014-06-20 Thread Gioele Barabucci
I filed this bug upstream: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731957 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #731957 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731957 ** Also affects: gnome-font-viewer via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731957 Importance: Unknown

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1332426] Re: WOFF format not associated with gnome-font-viewer

2014-06-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thanks, do you think you could report the other issue on https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gnome-font-viewer as well? ** Changed in: gnome-font-viewer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which