*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

Do a simple Google search or eBay search for microSD or FLASH memory and
you'll quickly realize something: There are some great prices out there!
That is, until you actually get the memory device in your hands, test it
out, and it fails within a matter of hours. There needs to be something
out there, a common technology practice, to correctly and accurately
test these memory modules the first time the user plugs in the device in
order to prevent imminent data failure at an unexpected moment.

I have the idea for the GNOME Disk Utility in Ubuntu -- To accurately
test any new memory module installed with the consent of the user the
second the module is plugged in and allowed to gain ROOT access to the
filesystem. A simple test like this can save the general public tonnes
of money when it comes to buying memory, keep malicious codes from
entering our loved computer systems, and help educate us on how to
choose the correct memory technology, where to buy it, and what to look
for, etc.. Included in this idea I have is an optional form to report
certain module types into a larger database that is interconnected
between all computers using the GNOME Disk Utility and connected to the
internet for even faster emergency diagnosis with instant fraudulent
device recognition that will then push a warning to the user to remove
the module at once and a set of instructions on how to properly request
a refund for their counterfeit device.

Something like this has never before been integrated into mainstream
computing methods, and it's about time a smart, automated, self-
learning, user-teaching system like this is implemented.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: gnome-disk-utility 3.10.0-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-27.50-generic 3.13.11
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-27-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.2
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Wed Jul  9 13:15:58 2014
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-19 (140 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Release amd64 (20131016.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-18 (82 days ago)

** Affects: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: Confirmed


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug counterfeit fake flash internet microsd nand 
securedigital trusty

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of the current abilities Gnome Disk Utility 
has to offer me on benchmarking a fraudulent microSD device I have received in 
the mail. Please note that I needed to have known what to do in order to get to 
the benchmarking process, after benchmarks are complete the application still 
does not tell me if this is likely counterfeit and has no automated "report" 
and "test" features."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1339820/+attachment/4148976/+files/Screenshot%20from%202014-07-09%2013%3A29%3A26.png

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

** Changed in: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1339820

Title:
  Preventing fraudulent flash memory

Status in “gnome-disk-utility” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Do a simple Google search or eBay search for microSD or FLASH memory
  and you'll quickly realize something: There are some great prices out
  there! That is, until you actually get the memory device in your
  hands, test it out, and it fails within a matter of hours. There needs
  to be something out there, a common technology practice, to correctly
  and accurately test these memory modules the first time the user plugs
  in the device in order to prevent imminent data failure at an
  unexpected moment.

  I have the idea for the GNOME Disk Utility in Ubuntu -- To accurately
  test any new memory module installed with the consent of the user the
  second the module is plugged in and allowed to gain ROOT access to the
  filesystem. A simple test like this can save the general public tonnes
  of money when it comes to buying memory, keep malicious codes from
  entering our loved computer systems, and help educate us on how to
  choose the correct memory technology, where to buy it, and what to
  look for, etc.. Included in this idea I have is an optional form to
  report certain module types into a larger database that is
  interconnected between all computers using the GNOME Disk Utility and
  connected to the internet for even faster emergency diagnosis with
  instant fraudulent device recognition that will then push a warning to
  the user to remove the module at once and a set of instructions on how
  to properly request a refund for their counterfeit device.

  Something like this has never before been integrated into mainstream
  computing methods, and it's about time a smart, automated, self-
  learning, user-teaching system like this is implemented.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: gnome-disk-utility 3.10.0-1ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-27.50-generic 3.13.11
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-27-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.2
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Wed Jul  9 13:15:58 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-19 (140 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Release amd64 
(20131016.1)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_US
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-disk-utility
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-04-18 (82 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1339820/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to