5.0.x is in wily, closing.
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1491964
Title:
[FFE] LibreOff
On 09/10/2015 01:28 AM, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> doko wrote:
>> sounds like laziness, not risk
just want to point out that you removed the smiley. don't know why, and won't
offer an excuse for further accusations.
> Its more work to reply to this accusation than to toggle that switch,
> making i
doko wrote:
> sounds like laziness, not risk
Its more work to reply to this accusation than to toggle that switch,
making it highly unlikely to be related to laziness. LibreOffice 5.0.x
being rather different from LibreOffice 4.4.x makes it quite likely to
be related to risk. Feel free to disagree
On 09/09/2015 11:02 AM, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
> The reason for the most of the internal libs is that there was major
> breakage from them from the gcc5 transition, and this is the package
> that was tested as is PPA. Bumping LibreOffice to 5.0.x and changing
> those back to system libs (which is
mathieu-tl wrote:
> ^ Please explain (shortly) in changelog what the change was
Added "adjust classpath". see:
http://people.canonical.com/~bjoern/wily/ffefix/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https:
The reason for the most of the internal libs is that there was major
breakage from them from the gcc5 transition, and this is the package
that was tested as is PPA. Bumping LibreOffice to 5.0.x and changing
those back to system libs (which is untested by end users in PPAs) at
the same time is too h
For nlpsolver and writer2latex, which also need to be changed with this
upload:
* fix build against LibreOffice 5.0 series
^ Please explain (shortly) in changelog what the change was, if it makes
sense to do so in changelog -- by that I mean, something more along the
lines of "update classpath
I noticed this in .changes for libreoffice: - use internal libwps,
opencollada, collada2gltf, libcmis, cppunit.
Without looking any deeper just now, that feels very wrong. Either there should
be more rationale as to why this was suddenly changed, or it's misdescribed (I
see in changes merged
Thanks. Please go ahead then, and land everything at the same time if
you can, so that we don't introduce new FTBFS into wily.
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subs
Build-time dependencies:
- nlpsolver, writer2latex both need a trivial classpath fix to build against
libreoffice 5.0, I will provide updates along with LibreOffice
- libreoffice-voikko builds fine against libreoffice 5.0.1
- octave-io has no buildtime dependency on libreoffice
- oolite ftbfs in u
I'm symphatetic to this in general, but as we are now rather late in the
game: Was 5.0 tested against its quite numerous reverse build and binary
dependencies? i. e. does nlpsolver, writer2latex, oolite, or octave-io
still work with 5.0? What about the various extensions like hyphen-* or
mythes-*,
** Description changed:
FFE rationale:
* A current LibreOffice major version is a important part of every Ubuntu
release -- this is a feature goal
* relevant user visible changes:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/5.0
* under the hood changes:
https://people.gnome.org/
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
13 matches
Mail list logo
