[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1720630] Re: Amazon S3 storage location missing from Deja Dup 36.1-0ubuntu1

2019-01-29 Thread Christopher Snowhill
I wouldn’t exactly consider Google Drive “friendly”, but I guess most users don’t have 10+TB of data stored on premises. That much runs for a minimum of $99/mo on Google One. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1720630] Re: Amazon S3 storage location missing from Deja Dup 36.1-0ubuntu1

2018-05-27 Thread bing
+1 *Please* preserve choice for the user, and make the full selection of backend choices visible. UI design can direct casual users to the friendly backends while preserving convenient choices for experienced users who often have specific needs. Options that are unnecessarily limited on the prop

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1720630] Re: Amazon S3 storage location missing from Deja Dup 36.1-0ubuntu1

2017-10-02 Thread J. Snow
Thanks Michael, you are right. I was not aware it was hidden. I followed the instructions on the wiki and I activated. I hope the team will revise the decision for hiding them in the first place. This can be quite confusing for the users. At any case, thanks a lot for the help. -- You received

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1720630] Re: Amazon S3 storage location missing from Deja Dup 36.1-0ubuntu1

2017-10-01 Thread Michael Terry
I assume your testing was on a fresh system, not an upgrade? We have intentionally hidden several cloud providers by default. See this wiki page for the explanation and how to unhide them: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/DejaDup/Clouds But on upgrades, your old settings shouldn’t be affected. If tha