** Description changed:
+
+ # Original summary: pulseaudio built with --enable-snappy but 'Enable
+ Snappy support: no'
+
+ # Original description
+
From https://launchpadlibrarian.net/377100864/buildlog_ubuntu-cosmic-
amd64.pulseaudio_1%3A12.0-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz:
...
dh_auto_c
This bug was fixed in the package pulseaudio - 1:12.2-0ubuntu2
---
pulseaudio (1:12.2-0ubuntu2) cosmic; urgency=medium
* Update snap policy to make access to audio recording conditional on
plugging the "pulseaudio" or "audio-record" interfaces (LP: #1781428):
- 0700-modules-
The attachment "pulseaudio_12.2-0ubuntu1_12.2-0ubuntu2.diff" seems to be
a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug
report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If
the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the
attachment, remove
Attached is a debdiff for a 1:12.2-0ubuntu2 release of pulseaudio with
an updated snap policy module and the default configuration modified to
enable it.
I also took the opportunity to remove the Ubuntu Phone era trust-store
module, which hasn't been built since February.
** Patch added: "pulseau
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jamesh/pulseaudio/+git/pulseaudio/+merge/352558
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => James Henstridge (jamesh)
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug noti
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1781428
Title:
pulseaudio built with --enable-snappy but 'Enable
We can't just enable the patches any more because it will change how
snaps that plugs 'pulseaudio' will work. Put concretely, the patches are
meant to detect if the connecting process is a snap and if it is,
unconditionally deny recording. Some snaps that 'plugs: [ pulseaudio ]'
have legitimate use
I'm not familiar with the workings of those patches - only basic fixes
to make them build OK.
Certainly "Enable Snappy support: no" looks like a bug worth fixing. But
I don't know who has the authority to decide about dropping any of those
patches.
Also how does this relate to Chromium?
** Chan
8 matches
Mail list logo
